Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

Sadly, we partly have Scalia to thank for that. He concurred with the liberal majority in Gonzales v. Raich, which held that the Controlled Substances Act was valid under the Commerce Clause, even when applied to an individual growing small amounts of marijuana for his own use. Scalia differed from the majority’s reasoning only in that he believed the CSA’s application in this case was authorized under the Necessary and Proper Clause rather than the Commerce Clause itself. O’Connor, Thomas, and Rehnquist dissented.


14 posted on 11/20/2020 9:37:05 AM PST by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: The Pack Knight

Scalia was a leftist POS. He just looked conservative by comparison, except to Thomas. I want 9 Thomases.


17 posted on 11/20/2020 10:06:19 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Reverse Wickard v Filburn (1942) - and - ISLAM DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson