If you can give me a single valid reason why their manipulation of the data would introduce a pattern like that, I am willing to listen.
As for the data, I believe the data they accessed was publicly available.
As for outlandish claims, the fact of the matter is, the Dominion software (involved in ALL the voting machines in Michigan) is perfectly capable of doing what they describe.
That is a fact, and there is nothing controversial or outlandish about that.
You may disagree in varying degrees about how valid their claims are, but I don’t see how you can, with what we know about how the software is designed, and how the infrastructure and security is set up (or in this case, not set up or deliberately flawed) characterize it as outlandish.
Having seen the functional diagram (distributed by Dominion before their name became nationally known to the nation) which includes potential network connections there are multiple points at which results can be manipulated. I say that as an IT professional, but it isn’t just my opinion, the State of Texas and other states said much the same thing. No, exactly the same thing.
So I disagree with your characterization of their work as “outlandish”. I don’t take issue with rational disagreement.
And the fact that such functionality EXISTS within a voting system is suspicious on its own.
There is absolutely no reason for it, ECEPT to manipulate the vote.
This is probably one of the hardest things to program within the system. simply counting the votes is easy- you just add by ones. You don’t even need to know how to subtract..
But designing and programming the software to manipulate the results with ‘weighted’ values (and not look suspicious) takes a lot of effort.
The ONLY reason this is going to be caught is because Trump was winning by such a landslide that they had to switch gears in the middle of the night and manufacture hundreds of thousands of votes instantaneously.
That essentially defeats all the software programming made to hide the voting manipulations.
It was done fast and they got sloppy but there was no other way to suddenly make Biden the winner- it was not programmed for such a massive landslide.
I firmly believe Trump got 80 million votes and Biden barely got 60.
Of course. We know for a fact that they can configure the scanning to flip votes from one candidate to another. That was done "accidentally" in one county in Michigan. They can put whatever bias they want into the algorithm. But it's easy to detect before or after.
Here in Virginia they run counting tests before elections and can recount after. A company providing biased counts would be easy to detect and face jail time.
That's why the claim is outlandish. Not because it's impossible, it's very possible.