And the fact that such functionality EXISTS within a voting system is suspicious on its own.
There is absolutely no reason for it, ECEPT to manipulate the vote.
This is probably one of the hardest things to program within the system. simply counting the votes is easy- you just add by ones. You don’t even need to know how to subtract..
But designing and programming the software to manipulate the results with ‘weighted’ values (and not look suspicious) takes a lot of effort.
The ONLY reason this is going to be caught is because Trump was winning by such a landslide that they had to switch gears in the middle of the night and manufacture hundreds of thousands of votes instantaneously.
That essentially defeats all the software programming made to hide the voting manipulations.
It was done fast and they got sloppy but there was no other way to suddenly make Biden the winner- it was not programmed for such a massive landslide.
I firmly believe Trump got 80 million votes and Biden barely got 60.
Yes. When I saw this, I tried to put on the hat as a legitimate policymaker who might want to automate the voting process, and have good intentions for doing it. I tried to envision rational or even possible reasons for doing so.
Someone asked for this functionality.
Knowing a little about software development and customer input, I had to try to envision scenarios, such as a local ballot question in a community where the average size or incomes of households in one precinct may be greater than another, and it would be a way of allowing votes that would take things like that into account, but...I was really stretching it.
Of course, that was all before I realized there was any Venezuelan connection. When I heard of that, I realized who the customer was who “asked” for it.