He uses the term “may have”. That’s not enough in court. Need “did”.
Agree. It does not sound like it is enough for us to overturn the results. Perhaps enough to launch an investigation. But not enough for Trump to pull through. We will see.
“May have” is good enough for starting an investigation, “may have” is where probable cause begins. You know about that presumption of innocence stuff embedded in the constitution, and the laws governing libel. It starts with “may have” (probable cause,) discovery for evidence, a trial for examination of the evidence, and then the judge/jury will decide preponderance of the evidence or beyond a reasonable doubt, whether civil or criminal.
Libel cover.
Also, you need basis to seize and examine the machines. After a forensic analysis then you can assert that it did cause.