Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerClaws

Yes, where TWO SCOTUS orders were Ignored!

They’re gonna love getting this case, I hope


6 posted on 11/17/2020 2:09:34 PM PST by dp0622 (Tried a coup, a fake tax story, tramp slander, Russia nonsense, impeachment and a virus. They lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dp0622

Yes. That’s the real issue in GA and PA.

Article 2 Section 1 of the Consitution States (with respect to how states select the “Electors” that go to the Electoral College:

quote:
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

This means, that the State Legislature decides how the Electors are set. Not the State Secretary of State and Not the State Court. The State Legislature.

In Bush v. Gore, Gore lost. He lost bc he was relying on a recount process that was designed by the Florida State Supreme Court. This process violated Article II Section 1 because it was not designed by a state legislature.

The COURT refused to allow the counting of votes pursuant to an unconstutional process.

In PA, the Mail In Ballot law passed by the legislature was essentially changed by the State Court. This is unconstitutional pursuant to the holding of Bush v. Gore. Further, PA legislative law requires observed counting. Per Rudy, 638,000ish ballots were UNOBSERVED. This violates the PA Law AS Written. The counting process is unconstitutional as applied by the poll workers (state actors) counting the votes. So per Bush v. Gore - unconstitutional ballots DO NOT COUNT.

In GA, the Mail In Ballot law passed by the legislature wasn’t followed. Instead, the SoS agreed to make guidance for counting votes in the manner he agreed to in a Settlement Agreement in a Voting Rights case brought by the Democrat Party. This Contract btwn the GA exec branch and the Democrat Party was NOT approved or passed into law by the legislature. This is unconstitutional pursuant to the holding of Bush v. Gore - which requires that the only counting method that can be applied is the one set by the State Legislature.

The argument isn’t voter fraud. The argument is mass violation of the constitutional procedure, as written by the GA SoS in a contract and as applied by PA in its shady arse counting procedures.

Rudy may be old, and bonkers and make a shitty presentation. But Rudy is RIGHT. If GA or PA makes it to SCOTUS - Trump is your President. Because of the incompetence or ill intent of the elected officials, who DID NOT FOLLOW their own law, or the COTUS.


8 posted on 11/17/2020 2:10:53 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: dp0622

Did Alito give two orders? I only heard about one...

“”Yes, where TWO SCOTUS orders were Ignored!””


38 posted on 11/17/2020 3:36:13 PM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson