Posted on 11/16/2020 1:30:54 AM PST by xomething
The Trump Campaign has now filed suit to examine Michigan voting computers
On Nov. 10, Fox Business host Lou Dobbs remarked, “I don’t care what state you’re in, this computer voting system is wide open to fraud and intervention.” The President retweeted Dobbs’ remark a little while later, adding: “True, and wait until you see what’s coming!”
Part of what was coming was quickly revealed, when the Trump campaign < a href="https://redstate.com/jenvanlaar/2020/11/10/trump-campaign-lawsuit-in-mi-asks-to-postpone-certification-until-dominion-software-is-validated-n278178">filed suit in Michigan asking that the Secretary of State be enjoined from certifying the vote until the software used by the voting computers can be examined to verify its accuracy.
Now it should be obvious to everyone who has ever used a computer that Lou Dobbs is right. It wouldn’t take a programming genius to write a script that would instruct a voting computer to flip votes from one candidate to another.
Proving that this has happened is another matter though since—you will be surprised to learn--most voting computers don’t save a scan of the actual ballot. Instead, they simply read the ballot and tabulate the number of votes. This means that unless you can actually examine the actual computer and its operating software—something that the manufacturers and operators of such equipment fiercely resist, citing security concerns--you can’t easily prove fraud.
But there are tells that suggest that someone is manipulating the vote. Such sleuthing usually involves looking for unusual patterns in the resulting data. And Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, looking at voting tabulations from the state of Michigan, has found one that stands out.
Dr. Ayyadurai, I should note, is a person of significant accomplishments. He holds four degrees from MIT and is a world-renowned systems scientist, inventor, and entrepreneur.
He and his team set out to look at the precinct-level voting data from the recent election reported by the four most populous counties in Michigan: Wayne, Macomb, and Oakland counties in the Detroit metropolitan area, and Kent county where Grand Rapids is located.
Now everyone knows that America’s inner cities are deep blue Democrat, shading gradually through the suburbs to the deep-red Republican of the countryside. So Dr. Ayyadurai’s team expected to find, as the percentage of Republican voters increased, that the President’s vote totals would keep pace. (There would be some exceptions, of course, for precincts home to colleges and prisons, but by and large this is what you would expect.)
But when they plotted the precinct data that’s not what they found. Instead, they found that the redder the precinct, the more President Trump underperformed. That is to say, the higher the percentage of Republicans, the worse the president did in relative terms.
The graphs for three counties—Macomb, Oakland and Kent—are remarkably consistent. (You can view them on Dr. Ayyadurai’s YouTube presentation here.)
What they show is that, in precincts where Republicans are 20 percent or less, the vote for President Trump kept pace. But as soon as Republicans numbers more than 20 percent, he strangely starts losing votes. And the more Republican the precinct, the more votes he loses.
This doesn’t make sense. We all know how strong President Trump’s support is among Republicans.
And then there is this: In all three counties, the president’s vote reduction falls in a straight line with almost the same slope. Such data patterns do not occur by random chance.
It suggests to me that, in the bowels of the voting machine, some little algorithm is working away, calculating the percentage of the vote that Trump is receiving, and then switching votes to Biden when he begins to pull away.
This is exactly what the good doctor concludes: “Right at 20% [President Trump’s] vote gets linearly reduced. … as if an algorithm kicked in and votes were getting cut from Trump.”
So how many votes did Trump lose in these three counties alone? Dr. Shiva suggests that the number is at least 69,000, and maybe more. There are dozens of other counties in Michigan where this could have happened as well. Bear in mind that, as of this writing, the President is only “losing” Michigan by 156,000.
Now you understand when the Trump legal team is trying to get their hands on the actual computers so that they and their software can be examined. Finding an actual algorithm that docked votes from Trump while adding them to Biden would constitute proof positive that computer ballot fraud had occurred.
One final note: If evidence of vote-switching can be found in the form of an algorithm, Americans will want to know who is responsible for engaging in this election heist.
Old-style ballot stuffing of the kind that may have occurred in downtown Detroit, Milwaukee and Philadelphia can be pinned on local pols. But who is going to take the fall if it turns out that computerized voting systems have been rigged all across the country to favor Dems? Just a guess, but I think this could go all the way to the top.
Audit the machines against the paper ballots.
If these are Dominion Imagecast machines, not only are there paper ballots, there are low-res scanned images on the memory cards.
There is no software glitch and these stories are a waste of time and make us look foolish.
Right. Itâs not a glitch. A glitch would sound accidental.
To me without even seeing evidence, I know damn well this election was fixed. You couldn’t pick a worse candidate than Joe Biden, and they want us to believe that “Trump hate” was so severe and wide spread that the majority of voters just didn’t give a damn who they elected as long as it wasn’t Trump? That’s absolute utter nonsense.
Another thing: If there’s no election fraud then why were democrats all year in courts across the country changing election laws?
[You couldnât pick a worse candidate than Joe Biden]
That’s for certain. Joe Biden was the most hated Democrat candidate. At Yahoo, 90%-95% of the comments were against Joe Biden. The only thing that had the same percentages were those against the BLM rioters and arsonists.
It was very surprising to me. Since there are so many Democrats at Yahoo.
Kicking, screaming and all sorts of lies, distortions and projections are beginning to happen all across the country. It will turn into temper tantrums soon when the truth starts to set in. Leading to riots, looting and burning before it’s over. The rule of law must prevail or the country is lost.
Please keep praying everyone. Pray for God's strength, wisdom, and that His will be done.
I also will pray for the members of the Supreme Court that are not sexual perverts, Communists, and traitors.
Yes and another thing is he picked as his VP a woman who was virtually last place in the primaries, it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever why he would not only win but “get more votes than any Presidential candidate in history”. It’s ridiculous. This election was absolutely stolen and the media is doing everything it can to shove it down our throats and force us to accept it!
RE: Audit the paper ballots
They’ve had almost 2 weeks to doctor the paper ballots. I know they are supposed to be sealed and sequestered, but these guys will stop at nothing.
So what will be done about it??!!
Like when the DOJ found Omar HAD indeed committed immigration fraud but decided not to press charges which leaves her to send all her campaign $$ to her shiny new husband - nothing??!!
THIS IS OUR FREAKING COUNTRY AND WE PAY YOU POS TO ENFORCE THE GD LAW.
Yep. This wasn't just a stolen election, this was—and still is—a coup. Well planned for quite a while now, highly organized, well implemented...at least until the very end when its backers realized more votes were going to be needed to overcome a Trump victory.
It's possible even Biden doesn't know the full extent of it or who is ultimately behind it.
Certain elements that are needed to function have been weakened, but some are, for all intents and purposes, in the hands of the enemy or its sympathizers.
This seems to be the essence of what the President's legal spokesmen (Rudy, Sidney Powell, Lin Wood) have been telling us over the last week.
“Now it should be obvious to everyone who has ever used a computer that Lou Dobbs is right. It wouldn’t take a programming genius to write a script that would instruct a voting computer to flip votes from one candidate to another.”
I was a lowly Cobol programmer for a few years and I can tell you that you could insert a small piece of code that could do whatever you want. If you want to flip all votes, if you want to flip every other vote, if you want to flip every third vote for a certain candidate, if you want to flip votes after a certain time, if you want to flip votes after a certain total has been reached, if you want to not count votes, etc.
The potential to alter election voting via computer tabulations is limitless. I read somewhere that some update/upgrade to voting systems used was installed the night before Election Day. It is amazing that this can pass any smell test.
In my view, we need to return to paper ballots and hand-counting.
“Right. It is not a glitch.” (Use NO contractions in FR posts yet.)
Vote glitches and anomalies all over America ALL favor the Democrat, don’t they? For decades now.
“Battleground states” may not even exist.
later
There are three records that must agree.
The machine count
The paper ballots
The scanned images
It is a simple matter to audit
It would be impossible to alter ballots after polling and make the three things agree.
It would be easy to alter the ballots prior to scanning.
There were no software shenanigans.
Thousands of faked ballots were run through the machines.
“I read somewhere that some update/upgrade to voting systems used was installed the night before Election Day.”
From Detroit 2016: https://www.google.com/amp/s/time.com/4599886/detroit-voting-machine-failures-were-widespread-on-election-day/%3famp=true
https://fortune.com/2019/08/08/swing-state-voting-systems-connected-internet-vice-report/
I heard the scans are not saved. Also I don't see any logical way to drop counts a few hundred at a time while adding to Biden, and have that happen thousands of times. You could imagine it happening a few times, if somebody saw they manually added something in the wrong place, but not thousands. Harder to explain a jump of 139,000 in MI and 132,ooo in WI simultaneously in the wee hours, after one witness said all the counting of real ballots was finished. That's computer tampering.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.