Posted on 11/12/2020 3:29:35 PM PST by Lockbox
Dominion’s exclusive AuditMark® technology is a unique, visual audit trail, allowing results to be audited down to each individual ballot. This patented process not only images and stores a copy of the ballot, but also appends to that image a record of how the voter’s selections were interpreted by the tabulator.
(Excerpt) Read more at edcgov.us ...
My experience with Democrats and election fraud goes back to the Kennedy/Nixon election and nothing was done about it then or since. After a lifetime of getting by with a behavior, people tend to get arrogant and with that careless. We also tend to ascribe greater intelligence and skill to our adversaries than they deserve. I don’t think President Trump is of the disposition to ignore this behavior nor is he lacking in intelligence or cunning. We may actually see something done this time.
The audit will be squeaky clean.
actually if ONLY the number of votes was changed hand counting the ballots is exactly how the count should be done.
Are they saying there is an image stored somewhere of every single ballot? Because as I understand it, not true in GA. Their system simply takes info from a touch screen, turns it into a QR code, which is printed, then scanned. There is no way to verify the QR code reflects the choices you wanted.
This was submitted 4 years ago in the winning Dominion bid to the State of Michigan for Absent Voter (”AVCB”) processing:
B. High-Speed AVCB Tabulator (B.1-B.6)
B.1 Two options for scanners are available. A small and large scanner. The smaller scanner was only able to scan
the 18” ballot in small batches. A continual stop and go process will lengthen ballot processing time on Election Day
and is not consistent with the overall purpose of a high-speed tabulator, which is to process numerous absent voter
ballots continuously, quickly and without interruption.
B.3 Adjudication must be done on a separate workstation, requiring two workstations in the AVCB. The workstation that
has the Election files loaded could be used and is a workable solution; however an overall solution utilizing only one
workstation is preferred and would require less expense and space for the local jurisdiction in each AVCB.
B.3 The adjudication feature requires a small network to be established. The network would include the ICC
computer/monitor, scanner, printer and workstation(s). This requirement may pose problems in some AVCB locations
(e.g., school gyms, churches), and may require local jurisdictions to find alternative space, which would be a challenge in some areas of the state.
B.6 Sensitive – piece of a ballot stub will halt the scanning with an error message. A continual stop and go process
will lengthen ballot processing time on Election Day and is not consistent with the overall purpose of a high-speed
tabulator, which is to process numerous absent voter ballots continuously, quickly and without interruption.
Scans multiple ballots before it discovers and alerts operator/poll worker of the problem which makes reconciliation more complicated. This may cause confusion in determining and finding the problem ballot, further lengthening the ballot processing time.
Any audit feature would reflect the choices on the ballot the system read. If someone faked a ballot then those would be the count for both the vote and audit.
The images were illegally destroyed.
Partially true. The printed document has the QR code AND who you voted for in easily readable text. I read mine before turning it in. Hand counting should be easy, just time consuming.
Proud GA voter.
Where is Jack Bauer when you need him??
“If never run through the machine, nothing to count or audit! That mostly the reason to trash ballots, nothing to see or find.”
*******************************************************************
That’s why any forensic investigation audit needs to go COMPLETELY from beginning (contracts for printing and actual printing of EVERY ballot), through each and every step/location for EVERY ballot. EVERY PHYSICAL ballot needs to be tracked through all its physical movements. And for every one of those physical ballots, EVERY ITERATION OF A DIGITAL VERSION (including all related METADATA for that version) needs to be tracked and forensically examined.
Remember, all physical ballots (including “spoiled” ballots) are legally required to be retained.
So much craziness surrounding authenticity, chain of custody, counting machine algorithms etc. etc.
I kind of wish they would just demand a preliminary counting of all the physical paper ballots that actually exist. I would bet money there aren’t nearly enough actual ballots to match the numbers they claim to have counted. In other words, i think they just made up hundreds of thousands of votes with a few “accidental” keystrokes, with nothing to back them up, If that’s the case, it’s game over right there.
This is great!
Except for the fact that, many states like mine do not save the “Ballot Images” for 22 months as required by Federal law, but delete them as soon after the election as they can.
It is a key point-in areas that have these devices, nobody counts the paper ballots.
It is the Ballot Image that is counted.
And in many states, it is immediately deleted.
Are these printouts under lock and key?
Good question. You would thing so, but seems some do not follow the law about record retention.
Hand count only
Unless you are trying to hide something, which the Dems and the propaganda media are experts at.
Those machines should have been impounded, especially any drives holding softwware that can be zeroed out or otherwise cleared/reset.
We can add that to a long list of items which should have been done. Thanks
Notice he's holding a black baton (a weapon) in his right hand.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.