Posted on 11/11/2020 7:56:52 AM PST by maggief
“This will help build confidence. It will be an audit, a recount and a recanvass all at once,” Raffensperger said.
any “recount” will merely be paraded as validation of fraudulent win
Perhaps I am wrong..??..
A hand recount will not catch voter fraud. Absentee ballots and mail-in ballots are opened and “verified.” Once verified, the mailing envelope and inner folder are discarded and the ballot is tabulated anonymously. The anonymous ballot sheet is all that remains. Any fraud related to the signature, whether the voter is a resident, is alive or dead, has been destroyed when the ballot is separated from the envelope.
A hand recount might catch election fraud. Any difference in vote counts between the machine and the EMS might be detected, e.g. “a glitch.” Batches of ballots that may have been run through tabulators multiple times may also be detected.
Is a true audit of mail-in and absentee ballots where ballot and envelope are scrutinized together even possible at this point?
Personally with all the BS going on, we should have only Republicans do the hand recount. Seems fair to me — and I think there would be an honest tally if Republicans did it.
It needs to be a recount and AUDIT to insure the ballots were legitimately cast and not illegally harvested or fraudulent.
I love that graphic.
Precise or otherwise — do I need a solution? No, I don’t believe I need a solution. I know recounting won’t work, and will serve only to convince more people Biden won, which he did not.
so exactly what will his “audit” involve? and by whom?
Yes, audit, recanvass, and recount:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3904854/posts?page=1#1
A hand recount is fine when combined with a forensic exam of each Dominion Voting Systems precinct level reports of votes from those machine. The Precinct Level reports to State Board of Elections/Sec State-— this is where the STEAL electronically happpened.
This is separate from the hand recount of physical ballots— which should have the presence of Federal Marshal deputized Cyber Security and Infrastructure Security experts who have the equipment to VALIDATE the actual ballots. ie. not being printed in CHINA or not one of the Federal approved printers for all ballots in the US. How about that grand slam cross reference?
All ballots that were being counted at State Farm Arena on Election Night after the observers were told to go home because of a pipe burst (which was not in the arena at all)— all of those should be sequestered by COURT ORDER. No body who was counting them then should be allowed near those ballots again— including the supervisors and Fulton elections thieves. Yeah- it’d be a black white thing maybe—but so be it. Justice is blind— or should be to the perpetrators as pre-judiced.
how could you be sure the timing wasn’t precise as coordinated with what they knew was already coming=== the ballot steal. Think it was probably what blew out the Election Day in person voting for Trump (which in GA was deliberately f’d up by the Dominion Voting Systems “programmed” vote flips— presumably the testimony as Giuliani mentioned today, of the Dominion Voting System workers whistleblowing).
When Georgia Head says audit he means whitewash.
Now, now Barr and Durham will save the day, read that right here, these things just take time, be patient. </s>
With poll watchers allowed to watch the polls, and object to the dead people and the multiple ballots signed in the same hand with the same pen.
Good point about the PR optics 2ndA— understand that the deputized specialists from Federal Cybersecurity (CISA) have the ability to verify the validity of the ballots themselves— as to the printing SOURCE (without going into methods and tech that is embedded). So this can be done concurrent with the hand recount and require observers inclusive of these people.
Buried in the flurry of reports from ATL/Fulton is one about China’s SFExpress packages being opened (video’d doing it). SFExpress has no service in the US— no pickup stations. So— by private aircraft (or diplomatic pouch to ATL chinese consulate?) Perhaps- but there is no consulate there afaik.
Here: a “Visa” service intermediary- chi-com: https://www.chinaatlanta.org/index-E.htm
China Visa Express-— yes, a chi-com front store.
Connecting the dots with logic. The investigation is of course classified, and not in the hands of the meddlers at see eye ehhh. That, and Pompeo’s confident posts (remember he was see eye ehh director long enough to ferret out the downline embeds holdovers from Brennan). Brennan’s psychotic fearful interview yesterday is another clue. There are still their bad actors around— but they are known, is a logical assumption, if the police work is done skillfully and covertly.
As reasonisfaith has posted-— This examination of ballots would be one aspect of a FORENSIC audit, which may be needed if the dems start playing smarta@@ and even rough. Armed DOJ Agents—the information is also shared with the US Attorneys so directed by Barr, and brought before Grand Juries. To encourage lawful compliance of the demonrat actors if nothing else.
I hope they allow poll watchers to sit closer than six feet away. In my area (Allegheny County, PA) they make the poll watchers stand behind a short fence, supposedly six feet away. I don’t see how they can get a good look that way.
Bump.
Good news if true.
I’m convinced those 95,000+ “only voted for Biden and no down ballot races” ballots were manufactured in the software. They won’t find physical ballots to match them.
+++++
Well now that is an interesting thought. I hope you are right,
But...
What if those 95,000 or so ballots do exist. It seems to me that it wouldn’t be too difficult to determine if they were filled out by 95,000 different people or maybe just 20. And those 20 would have been in a real hurry.
And, it is entirely possible that these are harvested ballots and could well have legitimate signatures of registered voters. If so that could be a big problem. We may need a chemist or two assigned to the job of telling what sort of pencils, pens, sharpies or crayons were used to mark the ballots. I’m betting it will a pretty small number since they most likely were filled out one night by those 20 workers.
If that is the case and you sort by the marker type you should find a small number of types and different types would be numerically related assuming the workers all worked at approximately the same pace.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.