Posted on 11/09/2020 8:18:55 AM PST by marcusmaximus
F Faux.
Scott (Dilbert) Adams said on Friday they would try to use “widespread” as a red herring, ignoring that “sporadic” is enough to corrupt the election.
Ignorance is bliss.....
Is she on some kind of drugs or is she just outright stupid. Just wondering if she lives in a bubble?
"Targeted Fraud" was the phrase he used this morning.
Also if you get the Wall Street Journal CANCEL THAT TOO.
I just did this morning, and the reason I gave was because it is “owned by the Murdochs and is no longer an unbiased source of information”.
What was interesting is I was on hold waiting to cancel for more than 20 minutes. I might not have been the only one doing that.
No longer watching FOX.
My friend told me people were refreshing their Facebook page this morning and watching the massive "unfollows" occur in real-time.
All anyone has to do is say "Newsmax TV" into their smart TV, and it's all over for Fox News. Buh bye.
Or get the Pluto TV app which has both Newsmax and OANN.
STRAW MAN. it doesn’t have to be widespread. we shouldn’t even have to have any evidence at all. all we should have to do is demonstrate that it’s possible, and that should be more than enough to compel reforms that make voting more secure and transparent.
Well, they’ve completely jumped the shark now. Any credibility the network had as a whole is now gone. I wouldn’t be surprised if they fire Hannity and Tucker.
If there’s anyone left with integrity at Fox
Here’s your means to escape
To be effective, the Fraud can be focused on a few geographic locations.
So the question isn’t “Is there widespread Fraud?”, it’s “Did some ‘Rats provide enough Fraudulent completed ballots in a few locations such as to change a few States’ outcomes?
did they really fire Judge Jeannine for being honest?
Already done.
How do they know?
Are they Private Eyes or detectives or FBI?
I actually get kind of tired of the thought that journalists are full-fledged “investigators”.
A crack pipe might explain it
These people must be neck-deep in the treasonous activity.
“there is no credible evidence of widespread fraud”
Repeat after us...no credible evidence...no credible evidence...
Except what we all saw with our own lying eyes.
Like we’re going to listen to some mewling moron who married a Murdoch for the $$$ and nice corporate jets.
Nixon later said he didn't challenge the election because he didn't want to put the country through such trauma.
In reality, he only preserved the principle that elections can be bought and victories stolen by Democrats.
What about today?
Unlike 2016, this year there were untold millions of, not just absentee ballots, but unrequested ballots mailed out to unknown or even fictitious voters.
When returned they were kept secret from poll-watchers in several large cities, notably Philadelphia and Detroit.
Similar irregularities were noticed in every close state.
The real question is whether Republican lawyers & analysts are smart enough to figure out how Democrats did it, and to expose anything nefarious to public & court scrutiny.
It's time for Donald Trump to overturn the historical legacy left us by Richard Nixon in 1960.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.