Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

James Murdoch's wife Kathryn agrees Fox News owners have an obligation to 'make it clear there is no credible evidence of widespread election fraud' (Defund Fox)
Daily Mail ^ | 11/6/2020 | Keith Griffith

Posted on 11/09/2020 8:18:55 AM PST by marcusmaximus

James Murdoch's wife Kathryn has voiced her agreement that her family, which owns Fox News, must 'put their country above their profits' and disavow President Donald Trump's claims of widespread voter fraud.

Kathryn Murdoch, 47, expressed the sentiment in a tweet on Friday, saying she agreed with CNN host Jake Tapper, who had stated: 'The Murdochs and the people at Fox have an obligation to put their country above their profits. It is very important that people make it very clear -- that there is no credible evidence of widespread fraud.'

'I agree with this,' Kathryn tweeted. Her remark came as little surprise given her history of public criticism of Fox News coverage, particularly on the topic of climate change, and her work with groups such as Unite America on bridging partisan divides.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cancelyourcable; defundfox; foxexit; foxexodus; foxpocalypsenow; foxratingscollapse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
Defund Fox. Cancel your Cable.
1 posted on 11/09/2020 8:18:55 AM PST by marcusmaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

F Faux.


2 posted on 11/09/2020 8:20:45 AM PST by tennmountainman ( Liberals Are Baby Killers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Scott (Dilbert) Adams said on Friday they would try to use “widespread” as a red herring, ignoring that “sporadic” is enough to corrupt the election.


3 posted on 11/09/2020 8:20:53 AM PST by CharlesOConnell (CharlesOConnell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Ignorance is bliss.....


4 posted on 11/09/2020 8:20:54 AM PST by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Is she on some kind of drugs or is she just outright stupid. Just wondering if she lives in a bubble?


5 posted on 11/09/2020 8:22:43 AM PST by saintgermaine (THE TIME TRAVELLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell
Scott (Dilbert) Adams said on Friday they would try to use “widespread” as a red herring, ignoring that “sporadic” is enough to corrupt the election.

"Targeted Fraud" was the phrase he used this morning.

6 posted on 11/09/2020 8:23:30 AM PST by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Also if you get the Wall Street Journal CANCEL THAT TOO.

I just did this morning, and the reason I gave was because it is “owned by the Murdochs and is no longer an unbiased source of information”.

What was interesting is I was on hold waiting to cancel for more than 20 minutes. I might not have been the only one doing that.


7 posted on 11/09/2020 8:24:14 AM PST by LizardQueen (The world is not out to get you, except in the sense that the world is out to get everyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

No longer watching FOX.


8 posted on 11/09/2020 8:24:46 AM PST by doc maverick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus
Fox is in the process of getting NFL'd, and they really are getting crushed as we speak.

My friend told me people were refreshing their Facebook page this morning and watching the massive "unfollows" occur in real-time.

All anyone has to do is say "Newsmax TV" into their smart TV, and it's all over for Fox News. Buh bye.

Or get the Pluto TV app which has both Newsmax and OANN.

9 posted on 11/09/2020 8:24:56 AM PST by AAABEST (NY/DC/LA media/political/military industrial complex DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

STRAW MAN. it doesn’t have to be widespread. we shouldn’t even have to have any evidence at all. all we should have to do is demonstrate that it’s possible, and that should be more than enough to compel reforms that make voting more secure and transparent.


10 posted on 11/09/2020 8:25:03 AM PST by JohnBrowdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Well, they’ve completely jumped the shark now. Any credibility the network had as a whole is now gone. I wouldn’t be surprised if they fire Hannity and Tucker.


11 posted on 11/09/2020 8:25:04 AM PST by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

If there’s anyone left with integrity at Fox

Here’s your means to escape


12 posted on 11/09/2020 8:25:35 AM PST by A_Former_Democrat ( TAG PedoJoe w/ DEFUND the POLICE OPEN BORDERS CORRUPTION DUNKIN/7-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

To be effective, the Fraud can be focused on a few geographic locations.

So the question isn’t “Is there widespread Fraud?”, it’s “Did some ‘Rats provide enough Fraudulent completed ballots in a few locations such as to change a few States’ outcomes?


13 posted on 11/09/2020 8:26:09 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

did they really fire Judge Jeannine for being honest?


14 posted on 11/09/2020 8:27:20 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

Already done.


15 posted on 11/09/2020 8:28:30 AM PST by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

How do they know?

Are they Private Eyes or detectives or FBI?

I actually get kind of tired of the thought that journalists are full-fledged “investigators”.


16 posted on 11/09/2020 8:28:49 AM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs. I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saintgermaine

A crack pipe might explain it


17 posted on 11/09/2020 8:29:13 AM PST by V_TWIN (Where's Hunter???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

These people must be neck-deep in the treasonous activity.


18 posted on 11/09/2020 8:29:13 AM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus

“there is no credible evidence of widespread fraud”

Repeat after us...no credible evidence...no credible evidence...

Except what we all saw with our own lying eyes.

Like we’re going to listen to some mewling moron who married a Murdoch for the $$$ and nice corporate jets.


19 posted on 11/09/2020 8:29:32 AM PST by Regulator (It's Fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marcusmaximus
Consider this: how much evidence of election fraud was there in 1960 when John Kennedy won a squeaker against Richard Nixon?
None that I heard of at the time.
And yet in the years since is was openly admitted that Kennedy's dad, old Joe Kennedy, paid for the election by buying off Chicago's Daily political machine.

Nixon later said he didn't challenge the election because he didn't want to put the country through such trauma.
In reality, he only preserved the principle that elections can be bought and victories stolen by Democrats.

What about today?
Unlike 2016, this year there were untold millions of, not just absentee ballots, but unrequested ballots mailed out to unknown or even fictitious voters.
When returned they were kept secret from poll-watchers in several large cities, notably Philadelphia and Detroit.
Similar irregularities were noticed in every close state.

The real question is whether Republican lawyers & analysts are smart enough to figure out how Democrats did it, and to expose anything nefarious to public & court scrutiny.

It's time for Donald Trump to overturn the historical legacy left us by Richard Nixon in 1960.

20 posted on 11/09/2020 8:31:04 AM PST by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson