[CheshireTheCat]

The dog that did not bark and the coat that was not worn.

[riri]

Well, a large chunk of the population can’t do maths and think math is racist. So, there’s that...

[Hootowl99]

This is about the best stated summary of the situation that I have read.

Thanks for posting.

[jetson]

Oh come on now. Why can’t you just believe and trust the socialist’s who lied about Russia, the Ukraine and pee gate for four years. They lied about Obamacare too but it was all just for the good of the little guy. ( yeah right)

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

In both Michigan and Wisconsin, several vote dumps occurred at approximately 4am on Wednesday morning, which showed that Joe Biden received almost 100 percent of the votes.

"almost 100 percent" is not a precise statement. What % did Biden get?

[COBOL2Java]

[Blood of Tyrants]

The question remains is if the Supreme Court can be convinced enough to a) believe that there is a way to determine legal votes from illegal ones and order a recount using ONLY legal ballots or b) determine that the election in those states is irreparably compromised and order either a new election or tell the state legislatures to disregard the results.

[DouglasKC]

I’m hopeful. But I don’t think they’re going to throw out votes based on probability and statistics. The odds are I will never win the lottery but it could happen.

[BEJ]

I tried posting the link on Facebook. Facebook won’t allow you to post articles that prove corruption without adding a website that disclaims it. There goes FREEDOM OF SPEECH! It shows you how committed they are to the Democrat narrative — you can only post pro Biden content without censorship. Disgusting!

[Vendome]

The problem with the lame argument that many republicans wanted to split the ticket is that Trump enjoyed well north of 90% approval within the party so, the math on that could never work

Besides, there aren’t enough mental cases who did that causing the results as they are...

[confederatecarpetbag]

The numbers here are not statistical anomalies or improbabilities. They are indefeasible. They are statistical impossibilities. They cannot be ratioed logically. The voting pattern is isolated to specific states, not indicative of a national backlash against the president. Only in states where the vote was decisive - swing states — does this voting behavior manifest itself. Such is the case too with states where turnout topped 100% - another statistical impossibility, when you consider that countries with mandatory voting requirements (i.e., Australia)never top 90%. No rational mathematician could argue against this, at least one who is being intellectually honest

[moehoward]

Dems ALWAYS overplay.