Posted on 11/08/2020 9:00:43 AM PST by CheshireTheCat
...The first anomaly is Joe Bidens missing coattails and Trumps missing coat.
Trumps 70 million voters are people who have a specific vision of America. They see it as a nation with a constitutionally limited government, a color-blind melting pot of people all holding fealty to America, and a place for an honestly run free market. They want low taxes, no unnecessary foreign wars, a secure border, energy independence, and high support for Israel combined with low support for the U.N., to name a few things.
These are not people who would split the ticket, returning Trump to the White House while skimping on the Senate. Instead, Trump voters are the kind who will vote Republican down the ticket, from President of the United States to county dog catcher.
Trump was the kind of candidate who was going to bring long, powerful coattails with him. And we saw those coattails: Republicans had a massive sweep at the state level across America, giving almost 60% of statehouses and governors mansions to Republicans. In the same way, at the House, the Republicans not only didnt lose seats, but they also gained seats.
Elementary logic says if there are coattails, theres a coat. However, even as the down-ballot races went a bright, rosy red, were being asked to believe that those same voters didnt want Trump. That defies credulity.
Whats much more likely is that those manufacturing fake ballots had limited time in their rush to create thousands of post-election day ballots for Biden. They werent going to fill in the dots for every race. They just marked Biden and, maybe, the Democrat Senate candidate. And thats what the data show:..
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
mark
Here is a link with ALL the graphs.
https://theredelephants.com/there-is-undeniable-mathematical-evidence-the-election-is-being-stolen/
The problem with the lame argument that many republicans wanted to split the ticket is that Trump enjoyed well north of 90% approval within the party so, the math on that could never work
Besides, there aren’t enough mental cases who did that causing the results as they are...
It wouldn’t be up to the governors, it wouldbe up to the legislatures to sign off on what the SOS’s certify or to intervene and appoint their own electors if they feel fraud was done. The Republicans took the legislatures in their houses and senates. Simple logic suggests that the real vote for president should have matched the rough same percentages by which the Republicans now rule in the house and senate in those states. If the vote is truly in doubt they must throw it out.
Now grand compromises could be offered where the electoral votes are split between the Republicans and Democrats by the same amount that they are represented in a given state house.
And I think that is how the courts should ultimately come down. They have to know by shear math there was cheating but who did what...that is the rub...so the solution comes down to dividing the electors by means of representation of the parties in their respective states. So the courts can offer a grand solution....throw out the votes in the entire disputed states or offer a solution by which the electors are assigned by means of the percentages of elected assembly men in each state which theoretically should match the TRUE VOTES FOR TRUMP!
That is how to expose whether or not fraud truly occurred in a given state. Watch the reactions to the offered compromise.
The numbers here are not statistical anomalies or improbabilities. They are indefeasible. They are statistical impossibilities. They cannot be ratioed logically. The voting pattern is isolated to specific states, not indicative of a national backlash against the president. Only in states where the vote was decisive - swing states — does this voting behavior manifest itself. Such is the case too with states where turnout topped 100% - another statistical impossibility, when you consider that countries with mandatory voting requirements (i.e., Australia)never top 90%. No rational mathematician could argue against this, at least one who is being intellectually honest
“Can any one point me to the data they are citing that violate Benfords law? The tweets linked in this article have some hard to read graphics and no links to underlying data. There are enough conspiracy nutters out there that it is hard to believe any of this without digging deeper. Otherwise, we will end up chasing red herrings that lead to no where until time runs out.”
The way to get this would be to go to the SOS sites for each state (pick a sample of contested states, clearly red states and clearly blue states.)
Then get the vote totals by precinct or ward. Pull the first digit off of everyone’s vote totals and plot them. If the Benford anomaly shows up for Biden in just the contested states, it’s a pretty good indicator something is fishy.
One other thought regarding replicating the Benford analysis. Maybe county vote counts is a better measure. Benford analysis is supposed to work better across counts from items that cross multiple orders of magnitude. I would expect the number of voters in wards or precincts to be fairly uniform while counties have wildly different sizes.
One other thought regarding replicating the Benford analysis. Maybe county vote counts is a better measure. Benford analysis is supposed to work better across counts from items that cross multiple orders of magnitude. I would expect the number of voters in wards or precincts to be fairly uniform while counties have wildly different sizes.
Another way to make the Benford analysis more persuasive would be to find that Biden and others votes follow the distribution in non-contested states.
Dems ALWAYS overplay.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.