You keep saying the same things over and over I told you several things that would count as admissible evidence and how just off the top of my head one could approach this
You continue to argue with me why don’t you just sit down and think about what I said and why those not just constitute facts but admissible evidence
To repeat Trump and his lawyers would not be pursuing any type of legal action if they didn’t have good reason including facts and admissible evidence to make a case to an appropriate court
You already made your mind up there is no path to success
I did not say there was no path to success. I said based on your original post I would rule against you.
I am done with this stupid conversation. let’s see if what you claim will come up in a lawsuit really comes up with concrete proof that ends up with a ruling of fraud.