I wonder how much the returned package differs from the one sent.
I wonder if the documents “found” are the same documents that the FBI took out of the UPS package.
Now we’ll see if it’s all there and what’s missing or changed.
NOte they state they found the contents of the package, not the package. So it reads like the contents had been removed from the package...
Don’t put “Hunter Biden” and “package” in the same sentence, LOL.
They found the “contents” of the package.
Does that mean they didn’t find the package? The contents just happened to accidentally spill out of the package?
Seems there are only two options
It was all just a silly accident - envelope got accidentally torn by machinery and dox fell out.
OR. It was a conspiracy. Someone knew Fox News had the Biden documents. Someone knew exactly when these documents were being sent out. Someone knew, among all the UPS packages coming out of Fox and the building that day, which tracking number to target. Someone had to coordinate with a confidential UPS staff with access to the sorting facility, or someone had to have excellent fake credentials to enter the UPS sorting facility. Someone had to arrange a transfer of the documents to whoever wanted them.
Ask yourself - who has the power to coordinate all this?
I am sure UPS will not tell us any more on this story.
Phrasing.
What is going to be interesting is when they compare what was found with a copy made beforehand and see what has been changed....
Never ever send anything irreplaceable. If important documents, copy Before shipping. Everybody knows this. Therefore, I believe the contents of this package were not important
Let me guess; The package is shockingly EMPTY!!!!
The left will change what the copy they took has on it and when Tucker shows the real thing, the left will claim it is a “changed” copy and that they have the real thing...
I occasionally go to the ‘occupy democrats’ page on facebook just to annoy them.
There was a post about how Tucker used the ‘dog at my homework’ excuse about these documents he “claimed” to have.
There were about a hundred posts about how they didn’t believe there ever was any documents...
I just LOVED bursting their bubble by telling them UPS admitted they were lost and they have located the documents.
Yoe — now THAT is hysterical!
After an extensive review of the contents, we have found the contents of the package are now rendered harmless and are arranging for its eventual return
When Tucker did the interview in California, they did it in some random dark room (probably a regular hotel room with the furniture rearranged). There were no shots of the location or mention of where the interview actually took place... and I don’t believe they’ve ever identified the location since then. It certainly wasn’t in a studio... This and a few things that were said certainly gave the impression that they were taking all kinds of extraordinary precautions to protect Bobulinski and the interview itself. Or perhaps the clandestine nature was just as much for Tucker’s protection? It’s as if they were expecting something bad at any time and their guard was way up.
At some point (can’t recall if it was at the beginning or end), Tucker made a point to thank Fox News for allowing the interview to take place.... why did he feel he needed to do that? Has he felt at any time previously that he had to do that? And why did Tucker even put it out there at all about this thing with the opened package... especially when it had the potential to open him up for some ridicule? Remember too that the issue of ‘danger’ came up during the interview... Bobulinski made mention that “he’d go into hiding for four years if he had to” (or something like that). Did the issue of ‘danger’ come up because he and Tucker had just spoke about it with respect to the interview itself? And why was it even necessary to send Tucker this package... I’ll bet he got on a plane and went to do the interview and came back the next day.... he wasn’t even there long enough to accept a package, was he? And as has been pointed out here numerous times, why wouldn’t he have just had it sent to him using some secure method of which there are numerous options?
It seems to that there was something specific that came up that explains all these random things (as in a very serious warning) and if the interview was watched again, there likely are a bunch more clues that make you go “hmmmm”. If so, I suspect that this entire episode with the opened envelope is not what it appears to be..... a trap was being laid for someone.
If UPS is arranging for a “return” rather than a delivery, does that mean the contents were found at or near the shipping point? (Or, does “return” merely mean to give to FoxNews, which was probably both shipper and intended recipient?)
Since when do “package” and “contents of package” mean the same thing?
all of UPS has cameras everywhere.
they were able to trace it back.