Posted on 10/26/2020 7:12:08 AM PDT by Red Badger
The Biden family is like a mixture of a really bad episode of Jerry Springer and that CNBC show “American Greed”. Damn sick.
someone ping humblegunner, he’ll want to come to joe’s defense on this.
Maybe devote your time to fighting against the criminal activity or to gtov efforts, rather than harping on freepers and Joe getting absolute fair treatment in the press.
Hillary: worst candidate ever.
Biden: hold my beer.
To me the hard drive stuff is a lot more credible than this.
At least there is metadata confirming the origins.
To me this smells like a set-up to create excuses to justify Big Tech’s censorship of All Things Hunter.
Its ONLY going to get worse.
Sometimes I am a little frightened about the stuff that is posted and taken seriously. I think there are some folks on FR that are just as crazy as Joe.
But...it is the week before an election. And the week of Halloween. The crazy in the air is palatable. I chose to sit back and mock it.
This guy os a legit reporter. He personally broke 2 other stories you.may have heard about:
1. Northam’s blackface
2. Cunningham’s affair
We’ll see about this one, but it shouldn’t be immediately discounted.
The Bidens -- One more creepy white liberal 'elite' family that's white trash...
As a little girl, she could be made to feel guilty. Plus, she realized what a specific public charge would mean to her famous father. I mean, we already know that the guy is a gruesome creep.
Maybe my actions are warranted.
Yes, the entire family is sick. This sort of sickness does tend to run in families, lasting over many generations until the cycle is broken.
The key to stuff like this with minimal to no verification is having content that is entirely believable. We all know Slow Joe is capable of (and probably has done) these things. Thus it sells - no solid proof required. Except to Rat zombies - even with proof they would deny it. So, IMO, without better verification it’s better left alone.
The NYT and WP stuff about Trump from unverifiable sources is usually so far fetched that it is dismissible out of hand.
“I chose to sit back and mock it.”
I’ll call them on their abject hypocrisy.
It’s disheartening to see what this forum has become. It started as a smallish group of erudite conservatives seeking enlightened discussion of the events of the day.
It has become an extension of the Gateway Pundit, not content with the bland realities of political discourse.
Any headline that confirms bias makes it to Breaking News, no matter how poorly sourced.
That was Billyboy Clinton.....Or should I say Billygirl Clinton???
*
When I first came here (-1997), the forum consisted of two primary constant themes. Investigating the RUMORS about Bill Clinton, and incredible FLAME WARS between Dole and Kemp supporters who were still mad about the primary election. I only lurked because there were some serious headhunters on here if they disagreed with you. Eventually settled on my handle because Eagles Up was the site’s battle cry when an infiltrator was about to be crucified. Now it’s cats and zots but we’re still aggressive.
My point is the site has always been edgy. Freedom Underground was an offshoot of original posters but the name is still representative. I’ll agree that we don’t have nearly the same level of hard nosed investigators of our own, but the interest is still there. And there are a lot more other sites feeding us potential information than just Drudge, which is all we really had back then...
bookmark
It’s normally considered obligatory to actually ping someone you mention. Otherwise you’re acting like a tattletale hiding behind the kindergarten aide’s skirts.
“Biden’s own kids are trying to sabotage him.”
Is it actually sabotage when/if they’re telling the truth in order for the country to understand what he really is?
“I think there are some folks on FR that are just as crazy as Joe.”
And they react the same way if you disagree with them. Not like the old days. Or, at least, much more common.
The diary, whether real or not, seems a bit over the line. No way to stop it now, but unless she released it deliberately, the ethics of using that are so tainted that I am loath to interact. I can’t really explain why it’s different from Hunter’s hard drive except that Hunter was a willing participant and perpetrator, IMO, rather than a victim. But even with Hunter it’s about the political corruption more than the other stuff. Should he get a pass on the rest? No. But let’s get him on the bribery, extortion etc., for now. The rest comes later (if we can’t get him on the political corruption, we aren’t likely to get him on the other stuff, either, IMO).
“The crazy in the air is palatable.”
I do not enjoy the *taste* of crazy ( ;-) ). But you can definitely *feel* it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.