Isn’t it a form of voter intimidation though?
Second by not terminating her contract immediately, makes me wonder if there is a clause that she cannot work for someone else in a similar position, thereby not sending her clients interferes with her Right to pursue happiness?
You mean a non compete clause?
Interesting point about “voter intimidation,” but I believe that’s a criminal offense so she would not have standing to bring a civil suit on it. Even if she could sue on that theory I don’t think she’d have much of a chance because it’s so attenuated. And the “right to pursue happiness” is in the preamble to the Constitution, and I don’t think it by itself provides the basis for a civil suit against an individual or business.