It didn’t exist. So what’s your point? Your question proves my point. If we had the msm on our side , they’d be running with this evidence even absent authentication. But they’re not and you can see the counter narrative forming like a tidal wave. Authenticate the evidence and you short circuit the counter narrative. We will not break through the msm stonewalling this unless and until the authentication is shown. I mean that is so obvious I just don’t understand how the contrary can reasonably be asserted
Reading comprehension isn’t your strong suit, is it?