To: BigEdLB
Lived in Colorado, only skied in Taos.
Colorado seems gone, gone, gone. Pessimist? Yep.
I think Trump could have a closer race in NM than CO.
13 posted on
10/13/2020 12:23:25 PM PDT by
SpeedyInTexas
(Localization, not Globalization)
To: SpeedyInTexas
Trump is spending no money in Colorado. I haven't seen any ads in a long time.
On the positive side I'm seeing lots of effective Gardner ads.
To: SpeedyInTexas
My grandparents were big in the Colorado GOP 80 years ago. Different GOP then
15 posted on
10/13/2020 1:13:33 PM PDT by
BigEdLB
(BigedLB, Russian BOT, At your service)
To: SpeedyInTexas; byecomey; Ravi; LS; bort
Colorado seems gone, gone, gone. Pessimist? Yep.You are a pessimist, and I'd like to know why.
Trump lost CO by only 2.8 points (~72K votes) in 2016. Since that time the Dems have a net gain of nearly 93K active registered voters, which is disappointing. That would translate to approx. a 6-point Biden lead. However:
- Unaffiliated voters (1.5M) far outnumber Dems (1.1M) and GOPers (1.0M) [#s as of 10/1/20]
- Johnson (5.0) and McMullin (1.0) took 6% of the state's votes, to only 1.3% for Green Partier Stein. That leaves 4.7% of "hidden Trump margin" that POTUS could tap into. He'd still need improved GOP turnout, which I think he will get.
Given the turnout machine still needed to save Sen. Cory Gardner, I have hope Trump pulls an upset here. It would be helpful if Trump were spending money and making a real play for CO votes, but he doesn't need them to win the election.
19 posted on
10/13/2020 5:47:52 PM PDT by
Coop
(After 14 years, it's time for a new tagline)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson