Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TXnMA

Another example, remember the “Airborne Laser” program (Boeing 747 mounted)...max range about 185 miles, power output 1 megawatt...weight of airborne laser & it’s power supply 121,000 pounds. Geostationary orbit height 22,000 miles, so an over 100 megawatt laser needed?? Even in LEO (1000 miles) then a 5 megawatt laser needed. Best solid state lasers nowadays produce about 1,000 watts per 77 pounds of weight. Not enough Falcon 9 Heavy or Delta 4 Heavy rockets available for that!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_YAL-1

https://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/the-airborne-laser-may-rise-again-but-it-will-look-very-1724892313


91 posted on 10/04/2020 11:49:10 PM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: Drago
" Not enough Falcon 9 Heavy or Delta 4 Heavy rockets available for that!"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

As we in engineering & science say, "That's about the size of it!" ;-)

The basic unit of measure for any beam weapon is Power Density on target. (i.e. watts/sq. cm.)

To overcome the inverse square law, that infers hellacious power (and power supply) -- and/or -- unheard-of collimation and focusing.

For simple ground attack, it's more "throw-weight-economical" to deploy kinetic weapons (e.g "Rods from God") than to deploy space-based DEWs.

TXnMA    
  

97 posted on 10/05/2020 12:59:09 AM PDT by TXnMA (The Democrat Party has a single-plank platform: HATRED...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson