10/04/2020 -- DEW beams into NEW MADRID SEISMIC ZONE as 1,100F temps flare off on New Madrid as well

Dutchsinse ^ | Oct 4, 2020 | Dutchsinse

[DannyTN]

Video at URL..

Swarm of Hotspots popping up on New Madrid seismic zone. Also hot spots on Wabash seismic zone. DEW (directed energy weapon) pointed at the New Madrid zone. Also examines some hot spots in NY and IL. Issued a watch for the New Madrid for the next 7 days.

Says the DEW signature can either be a HOAX in the official government data, or a mistake or the real thing.

Says a mistake is kind of ruled out by the presense of the hot spots in the same location. Leaving hoax or the real thing.

[metmom]

And it continued rumbling with aftershocks for almost a whole year. Should this happen today some of the big cities close by will be nothing but a pile of trash.

More than they are now?

The question is whether anyone would notice.

[Maudeen]

Earthquake insurance? I don’t think anyone will be able to find their property under water.

[caww]

LOL

[JohnBovenmyer]

The theory is that solar minimums reduce the solar wind and allow more cosmic rays to reach earth. Some component of them (muons IIRC) can penetrate deep enough to allegedly affect lava reservoirs. That explanation may or may not be correct, but apparently there is some correlation known between solar minimums and volcanic activity and/or quakes.

[GOPJ]

Many major energy pipeline—especially NG—which supply the Great Lake cities and upper midwest pass through there...

Can we assume some of the groups we spend billions supporting know about the NEW MADRID zone AND about NG lines and have a list of contingency plans? Or are our protectors spending our billions looking for 'lone wolves' while thugs burn down our cities...

[SC Swamp Fox]

Sweet!! I would have beach-front property.

[mad_as_he$$]

That map cracks me up every time I see it. Elko, NV is at 5,000 feet above sea level and is clearly covered in the map. Reno is at 4,800 feet and not covered.

[GOPJ]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0RfYQuCL_M

Interesting stuff...

[GOPJ]

The first time was in Califorina/Oregon with beams terminating in fires.

Ending in fires or staring fires? Or using fires as cover?

[Cold Heart]

Go to PNSN.org (Pacific Northwest Seismic Network). The earthquakes mapped there pretty much outline the area that will be the big one.

[GOPJ]

The question arises - do areas under seismic stress release heat signatures and is such release, once detected, useful to project whether there may be (further) earthquake(s) in such areas ... and whether such could also be one of the cause(s) of fire(s) still under investigation. THEN ... a few weeks ago ... he was monitoring such a case on the west coast when he noticed - online with viewers, etc., there was a BEAM being projected to these area(s) ... WHOAH! DIRECT ENERGY WEAPONS? Did the Deep State get themselves some satellites or something? Dr. Evil? Soros? China? RUSSIA? Iran? CRAZY! But it was there - inexplicable.

OK, you've just made it scary..

[DannyTN]

I don’t think he can really tell. He held out both as possibilities.

You can see the beam but there is nothing to indicate which end is the starting point and which is the termination. The presumption was that the the end in the fire is the termination.

He also doesn’t know whether it’s ground based and bouncing off the ionosphere or satellite based. Nor has he speculated on who or why. The second California beam a couple of weeks ago appeared to originate in or above the ocean.

He played a video of a Lt. Col. Bearden talking about DEW in the early 90’s. Apparently the beams can put energy into an area or draw energy out creating a cold spot. I’m wondering if that’s true, why don’t we use them against fires.

[TXnMA]

"Infrared burst from ground stress "

YES!

That -- and the Freund paper you linked to -- make excellent sense as a likely explanation of hot surface spots associated with a fault zone.

IF "DEW energy came from Space and heated the deep earth" -- why is there no evidence of spots of burned vegetation, etc. on the surface?

As for dutchsinse.com -- if you think you've discovered enemies with "Directed Energy Weapons" (DEW) -- and are looking for a juicy conspiracy theory -- you'll blame anything new on a that "conspiracy" -- rather than on scientific evidence.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Same thing happened in OKC -- including a wacko theory that the Murrah Building damage was caused by a "plasma beam from space".

'Way too many folks (including many FReepers) would rather have a titillating, juicy "Conspiracy" to blather about -- rather than to examine ALL the evidence and the forces of (natural) physics involved...

[Been there; wrote the (chapter of) the book...] (See my FRProfile...)

TXnMA   
  

[preacher]

l8r

[DannyTN]

Fine but what’s your explanation for the beam appearing in the satellite image? I didn’t double check this one. But I went to COD.edu (college of dupage) weather site and saw the beam image myself when Dutchsinse spotted the California beam.

Now to be fair, two beams doesn’t account for all the fires on the west coast. Dutchsinse’s theory that hot spots form due to seismic activity may account for the majority of them.

But if DEW weapons are being used to add even a small amount of chaos, then it’s something to look into. Find the perps and make sure they can never do it again.

[DannyTN]

"DEW energy came from Space and heated the deep earth" -- why is there no evidence of spots of burned vegetation, etc. on the surface?"

As Lt. Col. Bearden explained back in the early 70's, the hot or cold spot materializes where two beams cross. The satellite image only shows what looks like one beam, so where is the other beam is one of the unanswered questions. Maybe it's two beams in close proximity that don't cross until the target.

[SaveFerris]

[It would be so 2020 to have the Big One.]

You are so correct.

[Drago]

Yep, need some physics lessons here...DEW weapons by all accounts have not been deployed in orbit yet, and assuming they have done so in secret, then they barely have enough power to destroy/damage an ICBM at the top of it’s arc. (Enough power to penetrate thin aluminum). Orbital lasers/particle beams directed at the earth’s surface wouldn’t have enough power to warm up a burrito, let alone 1100 degrees or enough power to start a fire.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/27039/budget-docs-show-pentagon-aims-to-loft-particle-beam-anti-missile-weapon-into-space-in-four-years

https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2019/03/pentagon-wants-test-space-based-weapon-2023/155581/

https://www.nrl.navy.mil/ppd/atmo-prop

Only “hotspots” related to the New Madrid fault zone would be magma plumes:
https://www.livescience.com/39658-new-north-america-hotspot-found.html

[GOPJ]

Apparently the beams can put energy into an area or draw energy out creating a cold spot. I’m wondering if that’s true, why don’t we use them against fires.

Interesting question...

[SaveFerris]

Ya gotta love their spaceship design.