Posted on 09/28/2020 4:41:19 PM PDT by Kaslin
It appears that some courageous individuals, from three different nations, are attempting to challenge that.
Only with total f@#$wits and mass murderers and liars, and they only get one nomination. Nominating someone who actually deserves it? For even one? Let alone three? Check outside for flying pigs.
There are thumbs on scales and some very deserving people should get a fair shot.
...but when barack hussein obama wins with NO ACCOMPLISHMENTS, the prize devolves into is a meaningless political weapon.
There are some great leaders in this world who deserve awards for keeping us safe and securing peace under the most difficult circumsances.
NO DOUBT
The pendulum of history, in every aspect, constantly swings back and forth, and always has.
At least this is an attempt to take the prize back from the state that you describe.
I hope so and God Bless you Jamestown.
Kinda unusual for an impeached president!
You, too, Eddie!
Really well worth a listen to hear this Law Professor speak so highly and specifically about our Pres.
Australian Sky News Link: https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6195238657001
They all wish they had a Trump, too.
"I want peace, that's why I ran for president, to keep the blood of our young men and women from being spilled by war mongering profiteers like you, Joe."
For all we know, Biden has also been nominated this year. If so, I wouldn't put it past the Nobel Prize committee to give it to him in hopes of aiding his chances in the election.
That would be an excellent point to make.
I think Dylan had the same take...
Lousy post.
There were suggestions after the Revolution that we should establish a monarchy, and make Washington ‘king’.
He eschewed all of that; and went back to his farm.
https://www.heritage.org/commentary/the-man-who-would-not-be-king
https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/man-who-would-not-be-king
I guess I don’t, when it comes to issues that are crucial to our continuance as the Republic of the United States.
I especially don’t like playing around, on a site like this, with silly ideas that enemies are entirely ready to pounce upon. Journalists today don’t have any morals - they just want something to seize upon; and they especially enjoy demonizing sites like this.
They’ve been suggesting for weeks that the President will refuse to concede, if he loses the election. Your post was potentially assisting that false narrative; and that’s why I didn’t like it.
If you think it’s ‘OK’ to offer grist for their mill, then keep on doing it. I find certain jokes unwise, right now; and feel that they reflect poorly on the site, and all of us.
Put that in your crack pipe, LIEberals!
You should watch the Sky News Australia interview with one of the law professors who nominated him. I think you will be pleasantly surprised at how deeply impressed this man is with President Trump and his success as a world leader. https://youtu.be/OxGT_cQXpj8
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.