Posted on 09/25/2020 12:23:24 PM PDT by robowombat
The MEMRI Daily: September 25, 2020
IRGC Commander-In-Chief Gen. Hossein Salami: U.S. Is Incapable Of Waging War Against Iran, Its Weapons Are Outdated, Trump Inexperienced, Cannot Even Manage A Pandemic; We Can Set Fire To U.S. Bases, Interests In The Region
MEMRI TV Clip No. 8303
IRGC Commander-In-Chief Gen. Hossein Salami: U.S. Is Incapable Of Waging War Against Iran, Its Weapons Are Outdated, Trump Inexperienced, Cannot Even Manage A Pandemic; We Can Set Fire To U.S. Bases, Interests In The Region
donate_button_email.jpg new icon image.jpg
The following is a complimentary offering from the MEMRI Iran Threat Monitor Project (ITMP). For more information, write to memri@memri.org with "ITMP Subscription" in the subject line.
General Hossein Salami, commander-in-chief of the IRGC referred to U.S. President Donald Trump's reaction to a possible Iranian retaliation for the killing of IRGC Qods Force Commander Qasem Soleimani in an interview with Iran's Channel 1 TV, on September 19, 2020. In the interview, General Salami said that President Trump lacks any necessary knowledge and the political and military experience to wage war against Iran so he resorts to exaggerating the proportions of an American response to an Iranian act of retaliation. He continued to say that the American military is incapable of engaging in a war with Iran, that its weapons are outdated, that the U.S. economy cannot support prolonged military conflict, and that the American regime cannot even manage a pandemic.
General Salami said that Iran is capable of setting fire to American bases and interests in the region, and it can conquer all of its bases. He continued to say that Iran has been perfecting its "defensive capabilities" since the Iran-Iraq war ended, so it is prepared to wage war against the U.S., protect Iran from defeat, and win this war. General Salami added that Iran has "thousands of regiments on the ground." Referring to U.S. President Trump's statement that an American response to a possible Iranian retaliation for the killing of Soleimani, would be "1,000 times greater," General Salami said that this is completely unfathomable. He said that if President Trump had suggested that the American response would be two or three times as strong as the Iranian attack, this would be a plausible enough exaggeration for the purpose of psychological warfare.
General Salami said that the U.S. is working under the mistaken assumption that Iran would retaliate for the killing of Soleimani by assassinating the American ambassador to South Africa. However, General Soleimani said that this would be ridiculous because Iran is an honorable and noble nation and it would not assassinate someone who had no part in the killing of Soleimani. He said that the best revenge would be to defeat "the hegemonic order [of the West]." General Salami stated that defeating the American regime would be the most appropriate vengeance for the blood of Soleimani, not the killing of "of some soldiers or an ambassador somewhere."
General Hossein Salami: "I would like to reassure the dear and honorable people of Islamic Iran that no current power – American included – is in a position to wage a new war against the people of Iran.
m8303.JPG
m8303a.JPG
[...]
"When the leader of a so-called great country like America lacks the necessary knowledge and political experience, and is not deeply acquainted with military force, having not experienced war, it is only natural that he would turn to blowing figures out of proportions on a scale that is beyond the imagination of any human being. The American military today is not an army capable of operating in a widespread manner across the globe, nor is it capable of participating in a large war, such as one against Iran. All the weapons of the [U.S.] military date several decades back.
m8303b.JPG
[...]
"The economic indexes in America do not allow it to wage a large and prolonged war. America is capable of answering the basic needs of public under its management. It could not even manage a pandemic – something that was accomplished by several much weaker countries. It is incapable of running a war.
m8303c.JPG
m8303d.JPG
[...]
"If the Americans want to fight our country, they will have to be present in the region. They cannot fight us from outside this region. They must position themselves in the region and then fight us. When they are stationed anywhere in the region, they are under our eyes and our bullets. We can set fire to all American interests and bases in the region simultaneously. We can conquer all their bases. They will have to deal with the loss of lives on a very large scale each day. We can sweep through the entire region. The power we have amassed has taken into consideration the most pessimistic scenario of a wide-scale war against America and its coalition of forces. From the moment the [Iran-Iraq] War of Holy Defense ended, we have been expanding our defensive forces, with one thing in mind: That in a wide-scale and comprehensive war with the U.S., we would be able not just to avoid defeat, but also to win.
m8303e.JPG
m8303f.JPG
[...]
"Our forces must number thousands of regiments on the ground. They can be on the move, and if they do, they will take over all the American interests and bases in the region and set them on fire.
[...]
"When someone says that the response will be '1,000 times greater,' this experience is so exaggerated that it is completely unfathomable. Even an exaggeration should be plausible. Had the American President said: 'Our response will be 2-3 times greater...'"
Interviewer: "It would have been somewhat acceptable..."
Salami: "Right. We would have said that this is partly psychological warfare and, in part, close to the truth, and they want to respond in a more extreme way. It is very natural that... In response to what did he say that? In response to their mistaken assumption that we decided to avenge the blood of the great commander of the Islamic front [Soleimani], by assassinating the American ambassador in South Africa. This is a ridiculous and laughable assumption. Why? Because we are honorable people. We are a noble nation. In retaliation for the blood of this great man, we would never assassinate and kill someone who had no part in this. Our revenge [will be] fair and honorable. What would taste like revenge for [the killing] of General Soleimani and would satisfy the Iranian people other than defeating the hegemonic order [of the West]?
[...]
"The price for [Soleimani's] martyrdom and assassination must be paid by the political order of America. It is the hegemonic order, in which such decisions are made that must collapse. Defeating this regime will be the blood vengeance of Hajj Qassem Soleimani, not the killing of some soldiers or an ambassador somewhere."
“”1,000 times greater,” General Salami said that this is completely unfathomable.”
Let’s check the math.
Suppose Iran fired 100 tons of net explosive weight, across several hundred of their larger rockets. Then the USA would retaliate with 100 KILOtons of net explosive weight equivalent.
One kiloton back, for every ton Iran launches.
Actually, larger increments might be more convenient for the way our nuclear stockpile is configured, so lets just say one megaton for every ton Iran launches (a million times greater). That way we can service more targets.
Just 100, or 300 of our older, outdated warheads, would help rotate our stocks marginally - don’t want them getting too outdated.
We could rename the R9X (“Flying Ginsu”) bomb the “Salami Slicer”.
Those poppy fields must have been enhanced. That fool is smoking some great shit.
Perhaps Soros isn’t the only one funding Antifa and BLM. Perhaps the Iranians are also funding them. They all want the same thing; the fall of the United States. If you were Iran, and you had $1.5billion in U.S. dollars, how would you spend it defeating the U.S.A.? Not militarily, but by funding entrenched allies with the same goal.
BALONEY
“Bomb! Bomb! Bomb! Bomb Iran!
Who did that intel come from, Hossein? John Kerry?
Sounds like the general is the next contestant to face the Hellfire R9X “Flying Ginsu” missile.
“When was the last time we got a new M-1 tank?”
Pretty recently:
https://taskandpurpose.com/military-tech/army-m1-abrams-sepv3-tank-fielding
The Army is also working on a new paint to replace the old CARC (Chemical Agent Resistant Coating). The new paint not only is chemical resistant, but it lowers the thermal signature of the tank.
They’ve already started development of the Abrams SEPv4 Wich will include improved sights and cannon to allow an increase in engagement ranges.
Good question - and yes they have. It’s a new vehicle that’s armored by design, based off of the MATV MRAP, so yes it will have a more powerful engine and transmission. I’ve seen HMMWVs with commo shelters or those MI secret squirrel shelters blow out a lot of transmissions going up hills, since the vehicle wasn’t even designed for the armor weight, much less the weight of the shelter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.