Further along the road to hell.
So, how many of the congress critters in cali are members of ‘nambla’?
NAMBLA and other predators approve.
If I lived in the monstrously sick state of California, I would be packing my bags for territory having more acceptable cultural values. This is just sickening.
Betcha the penalty for wearing a MAGA hat in Mexifornia is greater than the one for oral sex.
“a judge to decide if an adult who engages in oral or anal sex with a child must register as a sex offender if that person is within ten years of the age of the victim.”
So, in other words ... is an adult who engages in oral or anal sex with a child a sex offender?
Is this a REAL question that needs to be decided by a JUDGE?
YES! HE IS! EVERY TIME, in ALL CASES! It doesn’t matter in the difference in ages! ADULT vs CHILD, SIMPLE!
How is this even a question?
Dumbing deviancy down.
Send "Orange Man Bad" federal and state government desperate Democrats home in November!
Supporting PDJT with a new patriot Congress and state government leaders that will promise to fully support his already excellent work for MAGA and stopping SARS-CoV-2 will effectively give fast-working Trump a "third term" in office imo.
I don’t see any problem with voting Republican ticket.
Insights welcome.
To paraphrase Ruth Graham: If God doesn’t destroy California, then he will owe Sodom and Gomorrah an apology.
The road to decriminalizing sex with children is long and slow, but it remains a road (for leftists and democrats.)
There’s only one thing to do with these pedophile perverts. Castration by hammer.
Within 10 years? That could be 15 to 5, 16 to 6, 17 to 7, 18 to 8, 19 to 9, 20 to 10, 21 to 11, etc.
Evil. Sick. The Democrat Party.
When it comes to sex, there is no such thing as a “consenting child”. Age of consent is written into law for a reason.
Now various venues may determine that the age of consent occurs at different significant events in life, and it does, but the rules and case law that have built up around what is appropriate and what is not have been based pretty much on some amorphous definition of “maturity”, which means different things to different people. Is the age upon which the child may be capable of reproduction? Not all people are able to reproduce, some never will. It is the age at which the child may declare “emancipation”? Again, there are several things that argue the child is not fully mature in many ways.
A child of three years, or ten, or even sixteen, does not yet have enough life experience to give informed consent.
Precocious does not equal mature.
“willing”
Welcome to Pedofornia, you will now surrender your children.
Sure, let’s perpetuate a common stereotype about gay men IN LEGISLATION!!!
The faggot rep claims this is to end discrimination against alphabet children. BS. They want freedom to diddle children. I say they and all other alphabet people should be passionately discriminated against. Queer behavior should not be tolerated in normal society. Queers who molest children should be dealt with in the harshest manner. If you think I’m harsh and want to look for the silver lining, think that the perp will look back on the worst man could do to him as a pleasant Sunday picnic compared to what he will experience in the hereafter.
Aw, gee that’s a shame Rosenbaum the Pedophile that attacked Rittenhouse for which he was subsequently shot (though not proven it was Rittenhouse) was unable to take advantage of California SB 145 before his demise.