I don’t know, but it seems to me if he was using his weapon and shot the person, he’s guilty
<<I dont know, but it seems to me if he was using his weapon and shot the person, hes guilty<<
He was protecting the business that provides his livelihood and returned fire against attackers.
Protected by 2A and right to defend your property and life.
If he can't claim self-defense then yeah, I'd say it doesn't look good for him. If a claim of self defense is an option then I would think it would boil down to his actions and the actions of those he shot before the actual shooting.
You two have got a cute little exchange going on here don't you? Way to go, but I think all the two of you are accomplishing here is outing yourselves as drones that buy into the leftist media lies and narratives. Do both of you also have Black Lives Matter signs in your front yard?