"Twitter has determined that attempting to exit the two party is not allowed"

Twitter ^ | 08 29 2020 | Eric R Weinstein

[yesthatjallen]

"So Twitter has determined that attempting to exit the two party is not allowed.

Let that sink in: we are not allowed to talk about exiting the bipartisan two-party collapse of the United States.

You discover this really is the Truman show whenever you reject the institutions."

Eric Weinstein Twitter

Articles of Unity

[aynrandfreak]

I like Bret Weinstein on many things, but he’s still a virtue signaler. Twitter’s bias is much more anti-conservative than anti-third party, this tweet notwithstanding.

[aynrandfreak]

Disregard, wrong Weinstein!

[abigkahuna]

So you have a group of folks that look like they want to create a third party. Okay—that is what makes this country great. Freedom of association. Nothing will happen for this election cycle, but who knows in the future.

How twitter can ban political association on the grounds that they claim is absurd on its face.

[ransomnote]

Dustin Nemos (YOUTUBE) has created a website for people willing to fight against the ongoing censorship.

Stopbitburning.com

The website looks interesting. The quote on the home page, excerpted below, seems to hold the key for censorship as well as the alternate reality we're living in wherein we know that Covid-19 was never a legitimate reason to lockdown our economy and muzzle the public, but the MSM and corrupt governors are pretending that it is. They are also pretending the Constitution does not exist, and does not apply to us. Here's the excerpt:

"3%. That is the percentage of patriotic citizens who possessed the powerful courage to stand in defiant opposition to the British crown. Our founding fathers, with unwavering tenacity, represented those who believed in fighting, with dignity, honor, and loyalty, against those who had every intention of depriving them of their intrinsic liberties and rights, despite knowing that taking such a radical position could likely lead to the gallows.While the other 97% remained in comfortable complacency, that patriotic minority chose to stand in honorable defiance of totalitarianism."

"We are that 3%.Today, we face the same challenge, as the establishment seeks to undermine the Constitutional authority that we hold so dear. Every single patriotic voice matters, and united, we will demonstrate to our enemies that we intend on fighting to preserve the rights that are inherent to us. It’s time to join the fight."

 

[AlmaKing]

Headline makes no sense.

[BobL]

Since Third Party stuff ALMOST ALWAYS takes out Conservatives, for whatever reasons or motives, I’m perfectly happy to have Twitter make people who might be ‘embarrassed’ a bit by Trump, have to side-up with the terrorists.

[dragnet2]

After the Trump era, the Republican party will be walking a tightrope. Any liberal bull sh*t from them, like before the Trump era, and millions will be go independent. Like me.

Or maybe Don Jr. will run and all will be good.

[palmer]

I looked through articlesofunity.org They are mainly anti-Trumpers plus a few useful idiots. They claim their candidates lean right like Dan Crenshaw who is anti-second amendment.

But the main problem with the group is they will be controlled by the deep state and the elite, not the people.

[Dr. Sivana]

Since Third Party stuff ALMOST ALWAYS takes out Conservatives

Disagree. John Anderson's 7% in 1980 came mostly from Jimmy Carter, and Ralph Nader's 2.74% almost certainly got Bush the Younger elected. Of course you have H. Ross Perot as a counter-example. George Wallace in 1968 probably drew from both parties. Jill Stein (Green Party) likely helped Trump.

It cuts both ways. The major party candidates are not entitled to votes. They must be earned.