While Tapper argued the convention presented a filtered and skewed view of Trump (of a president “not sending tweets that upset people”), he suggested it could help give the president an electoral bump. Other analysts came away with a similar prediction.
What’s the point here? I assume Jake is ok that the Democrat convention presented a filtered and skewed view of Joe Biden.
Don’t we expect conventions to put their best foot forward, for whatever candidate they support?
What is he saying? That the convention showcased Trump? And is that bad?
-—What’s the point here? I assume Jake is ok that the Democrat convention presented a filtered and skewed view of Joe Biden.
Don’t we expect conventions to put their best foot forward, for whatever candidate they support?
What is he saying? That the convention showcased Trump? And is that bad-—
Yes, the point is that everything that Trump does is bad, and if Biden does the same thing it’s either a good thing or it’s ignored.
This is what it looks like when you have an entire media industry completely in the tank for one political party. They’re Dem spin doctors, not journalists.