To: BenLurkin
A question of Constitutional interpretation is hardly a “conspiracy theory” Then sue. The sooner you file the sooner it can get thrown out for lack of standing.
To: DoodleDawg; BenLurkin
Then sue. The sooner you file the sooner it can get thrown out for lack of standing. I share your cynicism. However, it still doesn’t mean that we are not correct on this issue. It’s just that it’s a fight we can never win because the courts, Washington, and the media are so corrupt.
27 posted on
08/13/2020 2:07:48 PM PDT by
SkyPilot
("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
To: DoodleDawg
Why would I sue?
I’m not running for President, and I wouldn’t take the job if you gave it to me.
59 posted on
08/13/2020 2:37:44 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: DoodleDawg
(“The sooner you file the sooner it can get thrown out for lack of standing.”)
Who has standing?
Whose responsibility is it to enforce the qualifications for the office? Congress?
Let’s say K.H. was only 33 yoa (hypothetically speaking). Who declares her unqualified?
142 posted on
08/14/2020 4:29:32 AM PDT by
nonsporting
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson