Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PLA Rocket Force launches DF-26 ‘aircraft carrier killer’ missile in fast-reaction drills
Global TimBy Liu Xuanzun Source: es Published: ^ | 2020/8/6 18:38:40 | Global TimBy Liu Xuanzun Source: es Published: 2020/8/6 18:38:40

Posted on 08/09/2020 4:46:05 AM PDT by RomanSoldier19

The Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force recently launched a DF-26 intermediate-range anti-ship ballistic missile in an ongoing months-long exercise, after the US provocatively sent two aircraft carriers to the South China Sea for exercises and held joint naval drills with India, Japan and Australia in the Indian Ocean and Philippine Sea respectively in an attempt to contain China.

Capable of striking moving targets at sea, the DF-26 has been dubbed an "aircraft carrier killer," and its exercise launch again demonstrated its deterrence and China's firm will in safeguarding national sovereignty and security, experts said on Thursday.

A PLA Rocket Force missile brigade recently started a cross-regional confrontational exercise, as they maneuvered through complicated terrains such as forests, simulated hostile chemical attacks, disguised missile vehicles to avoid satellite detection and reached a desert area, where the troops received the order to launch a DF-26 missile, Chinese media reported over the past week.

The exercises honed the fast-reaction capabilities of the Rocket Force troops, and this kind of mission will continue in the next one to two months, CCTV reported.

Chinese military observers noted that this is a rare demonstration of a DF-26 launch. In January 2019, the launch of a DF-26 was shown to the general public in a China Central Television report for the first time.

Song Zhongping, a Chinese military expert and TV commentator, told the Global Times on Thursday that the latest drills demonstrated that the DF-26 has gained a stronger capability in real combat scenarios, including cross-regional maneuvering, and is not dependent on a preset launch site.


(Excerpt) Read more at globaltimes.cn ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ccp; ww3
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 08/09/2020 4:46:05 AM PDT by RomanSoldier19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

One of the issues with deploying systems that can carry conventional or nuclear arms is in the possible responses to detecting a launch. Since the opposing side doesn’t know if the missile is a limited strike or an escalation, the opposition may assume it is a nuclear strike and hit back with full nuclear force because of the fear of losing their second strike capability.

China is carrying on a continuous war of intimidation and small hits on the theory that, for example, no one will respond to their ship ramming them by firing a weapon to sink their vessel. So far, they are right. Because the first side to use actual weapons is the one provoking the war. So far, no one has decided to really hit back. But when there is a limited exchange, that could potentially cool back down, and China launches a weapon that could, potentially, be nuclear, the opposition may respond instantly with a full nuclear strike.

China plays a dangerous game, betting that the other side will always back down rather than risk massive casualties.


2 posted on 08/09/2020 4:55:16 AM PDT by Gen.Blather (Wait! I said that out loud?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

3 posted on 08/09/2020 4:56:47 AM PDT by RomanSoldier19 (Game over, man! Game over! ; : rem ad triarios redisse is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

Does anyone else find it odd that Chinese missile has English letters on the missile and the truck?
Why are Chinese missile hauling trucks always too short and the missile overhangs in the front and back?


4 posted on 08/09/2020 4:57:42 AM PDT by encm(ss) (Diesel Boats Forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

Cool hub caps...


5 posted on 08/09/2020 4:59:51 AM PDT by Laslo Fripp (The Sybil of Free Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

6 posted on 08/09/2020 5:01:12 AM PDT by RomanSoldier19 (Game over, man! Game over! ; : rem ad triarios redisse is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: encm(ss)
"Does anyone else find it odd that Chinese missile has English letters on the missile..."

Because English is the world's standard communication for all things aviation.

7 posted on 08/09/2020 5:06:16 AM PDT by Psalm 73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

Please see the SM-3 Block 1-B for our response.


8 posted on 08/09/2020 5:07:26 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: encm(ss)

It is intended for western eyes. One thing I know. To build this weapon, every shortcut possible was taken and almost no testing was done


9 posted on 08/09/2020 5:08:05 AM PDT by AppyPappy (How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19
Supposedly the DF-26 has a range of 2500 miles. It is 1822 miles from the coast of China just South of Shanghai to Guam.

But even so, the missile has to acquire and keep a target at a very far range.

Believe me, anti-missile counter measures are in place and always being improved by the USN.

If we see this coming from on high (it is ballistic, not a cruise missile), mushrooms will be sprouting all over the Chicoms.

10 posted on 08/09/2020 5:14:27 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (The prisons do not fill themselves. Get moving, Barr!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

The DF-26 is the B-17 of its day. Originally conceived as a maritime patrol bomber they quickly found that they couldn’t hit maneuvering warships. Next to useless in its intended role. Of course they found another used for them.

The DF-26 may not be able to hit a carrier maeuvering at sea but they would make it impossible for the Marines to seize & hold any of this artificial islands. Maybe that’s why the Marines are switching to a raiding role?


11 posted on 08/09/2020 5:24:54 AM PDT by Tallguy (Facts be d@mned! The narrative must be protected at all costs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: encm(ss)

Those are erector-launchers. The overhang in the back is to allow swing-room for the missile to pivot. Plus there is a practical limit to how long a vehicle can be and still swing turns on roads.


12 posted on 08/09/2020 5:27:44 AM PDT by Tallguy (Facts be d@mned! The narrative must be protected at all costs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Aircraft carriers are protected by nuclear attack subs. They call them “attack” for a reason.


13 posted on 08/09/2020 5:28:23 AM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

Escaping the dense forest is quite a feat for a anti-ship missile crew and then making it all the way to the desert is just nothing short of amazing.

Maybe it will acquire the ability to hit a moving target maneuvering ar sea thousands of miles away ... one day


14 posted on 08/09/2020 5:28:35 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laslo Fripp
>>Cool hub caps<<

lol...that's the first thing I noticed..well the 2nd. Looks like a Chinese made Tonka toy.

15 posted on 08/09/2020 5:30:25 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

FAKE NEWS, and fake missile. Since we spend so much more on our military than China does, nothing to worry about. Nothing at all. We’re invincible!!! Forever.


16 posted on 08/09/2020 5:30:33 AM PDT by BobL (I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's, I just don't tell anyone, like most here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: encm(ss)

I am going to guess the chassis was purpose built for something else, and they adapted it.


17 posted on 08/09/2020 5:31:01 AM PDT by rlmorel ("Truth is Treason in the Empire of Lies"- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Hehehe. He said “erector”. /s


18 posted on 08/09/2020 5:42:53 AM PDT by Afterguard (Deplorable me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

If they fall on Portland and Seattle will anyone know?


19 posted on 08/09/2020 6:10:11 AM PDT by heshtesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73
""Does anyone else find it odd that Chinese missile has English letters on the missile..." Okay....東風-26. (TC) And the missiles may not be of their design, but they are made at The China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation, (CASC) the main contractor for the Chinese space program. rwood
20 posted on 08/09/2020 6:33:41 AM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson