The ad hominem fallacy is one of the easiest to spot. If she prescribed something that cured 300 patients, who cares whether or not she’s a whack job?
RE: If she prescribed something that cured 300 patients, who cares whether or not she’s a whack job?
*The main question for the honest and sincere reporter is this:*
*Dr. Stella Immanuel says she has treated 350 patients with CoVid-19 using the Hydroxychloroquine Cocktail. It would be a simple matter for a good reporter to demand that she produce the medical cases that she claims to have cured and investigate them. There should be many of her patients who will be willing to come out to support her claims. I don’t see or read anyone challenging her to produce the cases she claims to have cured. That would be a simple test case to verify the truth or falsity of her claims.s*
*The rest are simply mocking and side issues, unrelated to the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine*
They’ve gone for the progressive, leftist, Liberal “guilt by association” fallacy too. This is a Reverse Galileo Gambit.
A Blue Herring is just as red as any other false claim herring they try, waving their fallacy flags frantically trying to point anywhere, saying "No, look over there, not here!". . . anywhere but at the truth right in front of them they don’t want people to see!