Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fatman6502002

I sat in a fascinating briefing about two years ago given by an actual nuclear scientist who was one of the team members who built the first EMP weapon.

High points:

1) they’re very hard to build
2) it takes a hell of a lot of atmospheric detonation data to even begin work on such a weapon
3) the Chinese and probably the Russians don’t have the necessary data and would need to conduct many more live tests
4) our power grid isn’t nearly as fragile as most think it is with local power distribution being the most vulnerable but fairly easily replaced if needed
5) the range of the effect diminishes rapidly and requires a pretty sizable warhead to get anything going that could effect even part of a state
6) the odds of anything harming us nationwide is almost zero

I went into it with “One Second After” on my mind. I came out of it not worried about EMP attacks; regular nuclear strikes are still by far the preferred method of mass annihilation.


74 posted on 07/25/2020 12:04:10 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Plans are worthless, but planning is everything. - Dwight Eisenhower, 1957)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Future Snake Eater

Late to the party ping to self:

In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled China Has ‘First-Strike’ Capability To Melt U.S. Power Grid With Electromagnetic Pulse Weapon, Future Snake Eater wrote:

I sat in a fascinating briefing about two years ago given by an actual nuclear scientist who was one of the team members who built the first EMP weapon.

High points:

1) they’re very hard to build
2) it takes a hell of a lot of atmospheric detonation data to even begin work on such a weapon
3) the Chinese and probably the Russians don’t have the necessary data and would need to conduct many more live tests
4) our power grid isn’t nearly as fragile as most think it is with local power distribution being the most vulnerable but fairly easily replaced if needed
5) the range of the effect diminishes rapidly and requires a pretty sizable warhead to get anything going that could effect even part of a state
6) the odds of anything harming us nationwide is almost zero

I went into it with “One Second After” on my mind. I came out of it not worried about EMP attacks; regular nuclear strikes are still by far the preferred method of mass annihilation.


91 posted on 07/25/2020 4:02:54 PM PDT by Mr.FixIt (Ethanol: Growing in four months what the U.S.A. burns in one day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: Future Snake Eater

I sat in a fascinating briefing about two years ago given by an actual nuclear scientist who was one of the team members who built the first EMP weapon.

______________________________

In A VIEW TO A KILL, Max Zorin (Christopher Walken) makes microchips which are impervious to EMP weapon...Then he sends them to Soviet Union...

In GOLDENEYE, the villains steal the Russian EMP weapon...It is called “Goldeneye”...It is in space...

Those are two movie which dealt with EMP...I don’t know if there are other movies...


103 posted on 07/26/2020 1:20:32 AM PDT by L.A.Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson