Attorneys representing Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre must destroy evidence from her case against Ghislaine Maxwell after improperly gaining access to documents, court rules
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8483209/Attorneys-representing-Virginia-Giuffre-ordered-destroy-evidence.html
gist:
‘Asked to explain how those materials came into the firm’s possession, attorneys from Cooper & Kirk explained that they had obtained access to the materials because Ms. Giuffre retained them ‘both to represent her in [Giuffre v. Dershowitz] and to represent her in conjunction with the Boies Schiller firm in the Maxwell case.’
If it’s a DC judicial branch member, I’m sure it is all very lawful
</sarcasm>
One time I was on a jury regarding a technical case. At one point there was an objection from the plaintiff (client lost leg because an operation was allegedly not correct) and the jury was excused from the room. We never heard what was discussed.
But when we went into deliberation, what was discussed was there in some documents. The plaintiff, the night he lost his leg, was drunk in the ditch, with his leg folded, causing circulation to be cut off to the part that was amputated.
We found for the accused.