Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barr: DOJ Changes To Big Tech Protections Are Meant To Protect Free Speech
The Federalist ^ | JUNE 21, 2020 | Tristan Justice

Posted on 06/21/2020 6:50:23 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Attorney General William Barr said Sunday that the primary motive behind the Justice Department’s push to reform Section 230 liability protections for big tech corporations is to preserve free speech following a progressive trend in selective censorship.

Barr said on Fox News with Maria Bartiromo that the idea behind the initial protections provided under Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act was to encourage platforms to take down obscene content while promoting an open forum to all users. Recent events however, encapsulated in last week’s attempts by Google and NBC News to de-platform The Federalist show online companies abusing Section 230 protections to censor unwelcome narratives.

“We wanted to encourage platforms to take off obscene material or harassing material or other kinds of offensive material,” Barr said, explaining that doing so would prevent a company from being deemed a publisher. “Unfortunately, [companies] started taking down view points and started really being selective and based on whether they agreed with the viewpoint or not taking it down, and that should make them a publisher.”

AG Barr talks about proposed changes to Section 230 protections for Big Tech companies including requiring platforms to be more clear about violations of their terms of service and having a better process to dispute the violation. pic.twitter.com/4iRpjADmnX

— Benny (@bennyjohnson) June 21, 2020

(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/21/2020 6:50:23 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

?


2 posted on 06/21/2020 6:53:07 PM PDT by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yeah, right. Those running Big Tech industries still think they are too big to fail. They don’t believe these new rules will actually be enforced, not by this Atty. Gen.


3 posted on 06/21/2020 6:54:45 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This requires a law change, correct? Because that will never happen. Anything other than an EO or rapid regulation change will not stop more censorship—enough to prevent flipping the house.

In other words,

This.
Does.
Nothing.


4 posted on 06/21/2020 7:35:17 PM PDT by Basket_of_Deplorables (This is all a communist plan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

Donate all your hats & caps to charity...


5 posted on 06/22/2020 5:47:45 AM PDT by TXnMA (Anagram: "PANDEMIC --> DEM PANIC")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson