Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson

Wrongful termination. This happened in her private life.
That manufactured TweetStorm/ RaceBaiting should have just been ignored by her employer. Those sitting on their high horses gloating about this may feel differently when it happens to you.
I thought the Cancel Culture was slowly disappearing.


56 posted on 05/26/2020 1:57:00 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lee martell

Like others here, I suspect that she may have exhibited questionable behavior before; and this was over-the-top enough to finally cause them to fire her.

I’ve seen situations where troublesome, disruptive people are kept on for various reasons - often legal reasons - until finally they do something provable that will stick.


76 posted on 05/26/2020 2:03:19 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: lee martell
"Wrongful termination. This happened in her private life."

If I found out one of my employees filed a false police report, I would fire them too. What else have they done that's illegal, or planning to do? It speaks to character.

78 posted on 05/26/2020 2:03:41 PM PDT by 10mm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: lee martell
Wrongful termination. This happened in her private life.


There aren't too many places on Wall Street that offer union protection; it's not like she will have a shop steward arguing on her behalf anytime soon.

In any event, it wouldn't matter; all of the employment agreements in the private sector are crystal clear that employment is "at will". And if it sounds harsh that one's stupidity outside of the job could get him or her fired, there are certain types of behavior that reflect an absolutely abysmal lack of judgment.

Someone sliding down a railing at a football game went over the side and fell on top of someone in the next level; he was fired from his position within days of the incident. deadspin.com

That he was enjoying the day off on his own time meant nothing to his employer.

92 posted on 05/26/2020 2:11:57 PM PDT by Captain Walker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: lee martell

I would agree.


93 posted on 05/26/2020 2:15:01 PM PDT by SJackson (Suppose you were an idiot, suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself, Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: lee martell

Many businesses have a “respectable behavior” or some such clause. Private life yes, though if you draw negative attention to the business they have every right to eject. She very likely would cost them more on lost revenue than her salary.


163 posted on 05/26/2020 2:41:26 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Interesting how those so interested in workERS are so disinterested in workING.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson