[Rennes Templar]

How surprising. Tank the economy. Then predict it will take down Trump.

[unclejohncornbread]

Same model that had hillary up by 10 and 2.5 million deaths.

[kabar]

The Dems have won the popular vote in 6 out of the last 7 elections. No surprise if that happens again. But we don’t elect our Presidents using the popular vote.

[lurk]

The economy will be nearly full speed by July 4, unless the dems can think of another way to harm it.

[minnesota_bound]

This model is as accurate as the 2.2 million people dying from the chinese virus.

[StAnDeliver]

How is this article even posted without questioning the source a little bit?

Oxford Economics maybe had a pre-existing bias against the President?

When they predicted not just a Hillary win but a Democrat Senate?

Would that have been useful to lead off the conversation?

Are we just going to go full Drudge and make this place an #MSM mud hole?

[StAnDeliver]

Seriously speaking, I think of you as a valued poster and I read your posts closely.

But these types of #MSM #Narrative garbage can be debunked with just a little research.

By all means post it, but provide the context. This isn't even a 'bad poll', it's a shitty economic model utterly unsupportable, from a company who said the Democrats were going to take back the Senate in #2016 when almost no other serious polling or CFR-shadow-econ org was pimping that absurdity.

[sport]

He may lose. But it will be because of vote fraud. To wit} Vote by mail and ballot harvesting.

Before you Trump haters orgasm in tour clothes. not even you will like what he will be replaced with. Within a year, you will secretly crying yourself to sleep wishing and praying for President Trump back. Before its over, you will learn, as the people of North Korea and Venezuela how good a roasted rat tastes. If you can catch one.

Meanwhile, the Democrat you helped replace him with will be living high on the hog.

[nicollo]

The model has correctly predicted the popular vote in every election since 1948 other than 1968 and 1976 (although two candidates lost the popular vote but won the presidency in that span, including George W. Bush in 2000 and Donald Trump in 2016).

So the model doesn't take into account the Electoral College? Waste.

So the model has predicted only 75% of presidential elections. Useless.

[Diana in Wisconsin]

The Stock Market is fine at 24,401 today and precious metals are kickin’ it:

http://www.321gold.com/

CNN is deeply saddened. :(