Washington Post Flynn source/felon was "senior administration official." Samantha Power queried the day before.

The Washington Post ^ | May 13, 2020 | AAABEST

[AAABEST]

The only relevant part of the article is this:

According to a senior U.S. government official, Flynn phoned Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak several times on Dec. 29, the day the Obama administration announced the expulsion of 35 Russian officials as well as other measures in retaliation for the hacking.

This is the entirety of the info on the Flynn leak in the WP article. Nothing else is written. It seems the reporter got the info from a "senior administration official" who hit the system, verified the date and volume of Flynn calls (and nothing else) to the Russian.

Question: The Washington Post aiding, abetting and concealing a felony? They know exactly who the criminal is. How TF do they get away with that?

[AnthonySoprano]

.

Samantha Power was working with McCain (they were friends) after Trump was Elected.

And Lindsey Graham is also friends with Samantha Power.

So, just like Graham has protected Biden - he’ll now protect Samantha Power behind the scenes and sabotage Investigations.

Remember, none of this is news to Lindsey Graham as he was updated on the Investigations via Rod Rosenstein.

This has been known for years to the Powerful Committees.

‘

[johncocktoasten]

”So why the flurry of unmasking Dec 14-16?“

The electoral college vote was the following Monday Dec 19.

[piasa]

And the Palestinian meeting is important because:

DECEMBER 2016: ()... during which Flynn contacted the Russian ambassador to the United States and asked him to veto a UN Security Council resolution condemning Israel’s settlements in the West Bank. -— Haaretz

&&&&&

The Democrats aren’t mad at Trump for Russian collusion, all along their real gripe is Trump’s relationship with Netanyahu and Israel, and the threat the two pose to Kerry’s Iran Deal and the ongoing effort to undercut Israel to please the Democrat Party donors. Remember, Obama meddled in Israel’s elections, and was likely paranoid that Israel would retaliate in kind.

But the Democrats CANNOT make Israel the issue or they might lose Jewish votes by inadvertently boosting Trump’s standing among that bloc, and in the eyes of Christians. So they made Russia the issue. Russians are a safe target because Russia is always pissing in our Wheaties.

The Dems went after Alfa Bank not because it was a Russian bank but because its Russian owners were dual citizens of Israel and Russia.

[piasa]

Obama and Israel, Strike and Counterstrike
12/31/2016, 11:32:09 AM · by Kaslin · 12 replies
Townhall.com ^ | December 31, 2016 | Caroline Glick
UN Security Council Resolution 2334 was the first prong of outgoing US President Barack Obama’s lame duck campaign against Israel. Secretary of State John Kerry’s speech on Wednesday was the second. On January 15, stage 3 will commence in Paris. At France’s lame duck President Francois Hollande’s international conference, the foreign ministers of some fifty states are expected to adopt as their own the anti-Israel principles Kerry set forth in his speech. The next day it will be Obama’s turn. Obama can be expected to use the occasion of Martin Luther King Jr. Day to present the Palestinian war to...

[Renkluaf]

Go through the list. Look at how many of the requests occur on 12/14, 12/15 & 12/16.

[Chewbarkah]

You are over the target. We all know the Obamans were obsessed with Flynn, so finding lots of Flynn unmasking requests isn’t surprising — what is shocking is the breadth of who was allowed to do this. If top intel officials “needed” to be aware of his calls, maybe that was justified. But the Assistant Deputy Secretary of the Treasury?

What I want to see are lists of unmaskers of Trump campaign individuals who were not the target of any sort of investigation or controversy, and for a time period before the election, not the transition. Then we need to get to the level of content — what were the spies “learning”; then what did they do with the info. You know they leaked to media.

[silverleaf]

The 35 Russian diplomats and their families were expelled with 72 hours notice during Christmas week
The excuse? “ Hacking the US election”. Now we know that didnt happen...at least, for Trump.

We deserve to see the background on this operation - who, what, why, when

[piasa]

The Deep State wants a Palestinian state... because they believe Israel was a mistake.

[mass55th]

"What I want to see are lists of unmaskers of Trump campaign individuals who were not the target of any sort of investigation or controversy, and for a time period before the election, not the transition. Then we need to get to the level of content — what were the spies “learning”; then what did they do with the info. You know they leaked to media."

Exactly, but I'm afraid any hearings, if any are ever actually conducted, will never seek those answers.

[piasa]

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/06/18/donald-trumps-new-world-order

[11th_VA]

“US Ambassador to Italy and the Republic of San Marino - John R. Phillips” Why?

Heard a theory on WMAL today. The more people that unmasks, the harder it is to find WHO the leaker would be.

[jpsb]

Crowd Strike said under oath there was no evidence that Russia hacked the DNC server. The democrats hired Crowd Strike to examine the servers. The FBI was not allowed to examine the servers. Seth Rich was Wikileaks source, not the Russians. It is all coming out.

[Zhang Fei]

[If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both ]

---

Can’t really imprison a judge. It would a Gracchi moment - unleashing furies that would result in the end of the Republic. Just as surely as the Gracchi brothers’ acts led to Marius’s and Sulla’s bloody rivalry, and ultimately to Julius Caesar’s dictatorship, going after judges would result in the eventual coronation of a king after decades of bloody civil war dwarfing the Late Unpleasantness.

[Jim Noble]

My quote was intended to highlight (in bold) the repeated use of "by force" in the statute.

It will be difficult to convict the conspirators of the use of force in their conspiracy, although apparently there is still concealed evidence that murder of the candidate or President-elect was discussed.

[Lurker]

Mafsud.

That’s why.

L