Posted on 05/02/2020 1:42:17 AM PDT by Jim Robinson
Never forget that Dr. Fauci and the liberal media continues to cast doubt on this widely successful treatment for coronavirus.
A nursing home in Texas has a hopeful story for those suffering with coronavirus.
The Resort at Texas nursing home had an outbreak of coronavirus that infected 56 residents and 33 staff members.
Dr. Robin Armstrong immediately administered hydroxychloroquine to the residents and staff members along with Zpac and Zinc.
Only one nursing home patient died since the doctor prescribed the hydroxychloroquine. 55 made it.
This drug is having amazing success treating the coronavirus.
But the liberal media would rather see people die than report the truth on this treatment.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Anecdotal. Nothing to see here.
I can’t find an update on how these folks are doing. News is nearly a week old.
Can someone please help me? Is HCQ+ZP+Z now the standard medical protocol for treating CV-19...and if not what the heck is holding up this apparently great treatment??
-TY.
What are the chances that theres some cahootery going on between big pharma and big politicians to keep HYC+ZP+Z in the dark so that they can try to pass a different treatment that will guarantee them big money?
“What are the chances that theres some cahootery going on between big pharma and big politicians to keep HYC+ZP+Z in the dark so that they can try to pass a different treatment that will guarantee them big money?”
Real good. Also the Marxist element well established in the US, who were desperate to destroy Trump’s economic miracle.
And succeeded. 30 Million newly unemployed.
Thirty. Million. And it’s just getting started.
here’s the direct link to the original article that GP ripped off:
The BEST natural preventative supplement for the virus as learned here on Free Republic
•Vitamin C 500 mg BID
•Quercetin Phytosome 250-500 mg BID
•Zinc 75-100 mg/day (zinc picolinate preferred). After 1 month, reduce the dose to 30-50 mg/day.
•Melatonin (slow release): Begin with 0.3mg and increase as tolerated to 1-2 mg at night
•Vitamin D3 1000-4000 u/day or lots and lots of sunshine (optimal dose unknown).
Not to be a downer but....
1 death out of 55 infected is like 1.6% death rate, even with the medicine.
MSM news headline (parody):
“Trump’s Poison Kills One at Texas Home.”
Freegards Jim Noble!
I do believe that Dr. Zelenski is working on just such a question. Using the VA post treatment research rubric which showed the failure he will report all his results against some kind of statistical expectation. If you see it first will you ping me? Maybe some few weeks though I have not heard when we can expect the report.
Please correct me anyone, but I think this is the most important question in society today. It’s time we got an answer!
It's 1.8%, and it's HIGHER than the all-comers expected death rate with no treatment.
Look, the HCQ people have to submit to some sort of analysis that will produce a meaningful result.
First, it's a miracle drug that "saves everybody"
Then it's "It saves everybody because HCQ suppresses inflammation in the lungs"
Then, it's "well, they gave it too late, what do you expect, once you have inflammation in the lungs it doesn't work".
Then, it's "you have to start it right away", without a comparison to all the minimally ill people who recover with no treatment.
I have said over and over that I believe Didier Raoult, that HCQ + azithromycin exhibits an antiviral effect on SARS CoV 2.
Just how this actual antiviral effect plays into treating real people with various stages of SARS CoV 2 infection remains to be seen. It's been used routinely in US hospitals for six to eight weeks, and the opinion of people who have treated lots of patients is becoming increasingly negative.
3,345,207 confirmed cases, 238,649 died or 7.1% without HCQ
3,207 given HCQ, 15 died (who were treated at least 3 days w/ HCQ) or 0.47%
Given that the 3,207 treated were in France and not in NY, we probably don't have to consider outright fraud as no Democrats are involved.
Analysis: 0.47% death rate death rate is a he$$ of a lot better than 7.1% death rate
I think that 1 death out of 55 infected cases is about the rate in the general population. I do not think this is the rate in a nursing home that becomes widely infected. The death rate in such a nursing home is seemingly much higher
I didn’t see or hear anything about how the NH staff did on HCQ. Did I overlook that or is it missing?
Found this in another article on same case:
“99 percent of the staff stayed we had 34 employees that contracted Coronavirus all lived and 98% are back at work right now,” Griffin said.
FOX 26 gets unprecedented access to Texas’ 1st nursing home to treat COVID-19 with Hydroxychloroquine (More anecdotal success stories)
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3841025/posts
thanks for the simple explanation of remdesivirs mechanism of action
[It’s 1.8%, and it’s HIGHER than the all-comers expected death rate with no treatment.]
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us
And of people symptomatic enough to require treatment by a medical professional (i.e. the ones who were given the malaria drug) higher?
Note that I don’t have a strong opinion about the malaria drug, and am looking at this from a pure numbers perspective.
“It’s 1.8%, and it’s HIGHER than the all-comers expected death rate with no treatment.”
But what’s the death rate of the risk groups of people likely to be residents of a nursing home?
But what’s the death rate of the risk groups of people likely to be residents of a nursing home?
Precisely. The nursing home population skews 100% to the elderly (high-risk) and is not representative of a cross-section of the United States. If anything; the expected death rate should be much higher among the nursing home population than in the general population.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.