Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/13/2020 9:50:13 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

“has reached the point where they simply can’t be trusted”

Yeah, CNN jumped THAT shark many moons ago.


2 posted on 04/13/2020 9:55:10 AM PDT by Macoozie (Handcuffs and Orange Jumpsuits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Stelter probably thinks that “federalism” means an all-powerful federal government.


4 posted on 04/13/2020 10:07:26 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

With most airports deserted, CNN’s audience is pretty much gone...as it should be.


5 posted on 04/13/2020 10:10:31 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin; LS

What did I tell you LS? No matter what he does he will get hammered by the media.


7 posted on 04/13/2020 10:17:49 AM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The President demonstrated the exact same unfamiliarity with federalism on Twitter this morning, unfortunately.


8 posted on 04/13/2020 10:17:56 AM PDT by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Indeed... The Federal government was not created to rule, judge or govern the States (or to be the source of such aggressions on behalf of other member or foreign States). Rather the complete opposite was intended, as was simply stated on June 27, 1787 in convention,

“...the General (Federal) Government was meant merely to PRESERVE the State Governments: NOT to govern individuals: that its powers ought to be kept WITHIN NARROW LIMITS; that if too little power was given to it, more might be added; but that if too much, it could never be resumed: that INDIVIDUALS as such have LITTLE to do BUT with their OWN States;”

So, where is it in the Constitution (or suggested anywhere in Convention) that the other way around was intended — i.e. that the People have little to do with their own States instead of little to do with the Federal Government, and that the People’s business was with each other’s States and not with their own and that the business of the “Federal” government was the welfare of individuals?

How is interfering with the State governments (regulating all that which has to do with the lives, liberties, choices, morals, habits, customs, health, wages, etc. of individuals) preserving the State governments? — And, going so far as to sue States in order to PREVENT them from supporting and upholding the Constitution and all the “legitimate” laws made in pursuant of it that every State official is obligate by oath to support and uphold? How are such acts against the States “preserving” their governments, or the Constitution for that matter?... IT DOESN’T!

The Federal government tentacles has invaded EVERY aspect of our public and private daily lives/affairs... interfering into our rights to be free individuals and sovereigns.

The Federal Government has WAY overstepped it’s authority beyond the intended reach of our founders whose intent was in leaving the affairs of the states and its people in their respective hands. The 9th/10th amendments are quite clear on this.


9 posted on 04/13/2020 10:33:43 AM PDT by Bellagio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I hate to judge people by their looks, but I will. This guy looks as stupid as a rock.


10 posted on 04/13/2020 10:36:00 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

90% of Congress is equally ignorant of the Constitution.


11 posted on 04/13/2020 10:42:09 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

OUT OF SHADOWS

https://youtu.be/MY8Nfzcn1qQ


20 posted on 04/13/2020 1:44:46 PM PDT by RasterMaster ("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Very good article on federalism.

Of course most “journalists” are ignorant of the concept, since they have no idea what the constitution is about. To most of them, all power should reside in someone like Pelousi, Shillary, or the Kenyan Fraud.


21 posted on 04/13/2020 4:39:09 PM PDT by SharpRightTurn (Chuck Schumer--giving pond scum everywhere a bad name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I don’t disagree with Mr. Marcus at all in his analysis of the powers of the states. I’m curious as to what he wouldh have to say about the President’s claim that he alone has the authority to open the states up again.


24 posted on 04/14/2020 3:55:12 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Related...

For Easter, a federal judge wrote a luminous decision defending religious liberty

And, to my mind, the overbroad and under inclusive apply to far more than prohibitions on religious practice.

25 posted on 04/14/2020 3:58:19 AM PDT by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson