To: CivilWarBrewing
No, it’s the opposite. These Chinese kits are mostly guilty of creating false POSITIVES, not negatives.
Thus, a mass hysteria is being created. Without cause.
To: Professional
The article states that the tests are only identifying positives 30% of the time. In other words, if it should identify 100 people as positive, it is only saying 30 people are positive. It’s generating false negatives.
13 posted on
03/28/2020 11:45:42 PM PDT by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Professional
You are wrong! The tests are only identifying 30% of positive cases, meaning they are downplaying numbers.
18 posted on
03/29/2020 12:13:07 AM PDT by
spetznaz
(Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
To: Professional
More positives would indeed prolong the economic destruction, however.
22 posted on
03/29/2020 12:30:59 AM PDT by
CivilWarBrewing
(Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
To: Professional
One of my best friends- daughters has it. She is 19 and having a rough go of it. Her test was a false negative. Now-it’s positive. There are many issues with tests. Period.
Crappy thing about a negative test is she spent 3 days around her twin-who is immuno- compromised. Now we wait....
41 posted on
03/29/2020 6:16:39 AM PDT by
NELSON111
(Congress: The Ralph Wolf and Sam Sheepdog s<how. Theater for sheep. My politics determines my "hero")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson