From AG Barr’s perspective, there’s no way the institutions of government could survive the potential evidence at a McCabe trial.
AG Barr can’t possibly be this delusional. NAMBLA and ISIS deserve more public respect than the DOJ right now. Barr has to know this better than anyone.
I’m at the point where I wouldn’t even vote to convict a defendant in a case where the evidence against him was 100% certain. I’m sure I’m far from the only one who operates this way. How do the “institutions of government” hold up under that kind of scenario?
Jury nullification .... looking at the cr@p presented & lying that went on in the Flynn case, I don’t know how you believe anything the government presents. Sidney says she has evidence of a manipulated 302 that the prosecutor says they don’t have - that’s pretty damning ... plus all the other stuff, including trapping Flynn (Comey admitted it). Anyway, if on a jury, I think I’d have a hard time voting to convict based on what has been going on with recent cases. Letting McCabe off is beyond disgusting - everyone I know is seriously pissed about it.