Posted on 02/04/2020 9:25:09 AM PST by Timocrat
Rand Paul lays out the conspiracy in his senate speech. Re-asks his question about two people on the National Security Sean Misko and Eric CIAramella
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khloPIKjS1k&feature=emb_logo
Sen Rand Paul R-KY on the Senate floor right now with his impeachment trial speech;
Feb 4, 2020
Rand Paul just read aloud his question on the Senate floor that names the alleged. Roberts declined to read the question during the trial. Paul says he’s not outing the bc he doesn’t know who it is.
Yes, a MUST SEE. HOORAY Rand. Thank you, sir.
I wonder if Graham will have the balls to actually use Ciaramella's name when, and if he ever holds hearings. Not holding my breath on this one.
He asked the question today I did when Roberts refused to allow Rand Paul's initial question during the stupid impeachment trial. How did Justice Roberts know all this unknowable info about Ciarmella?
Yes he did, just watched this. He did good.
ListenLater
And when a former prosecutor has to lie about having served in Vietnam, we all know what a lying prosecutor he was.
So alleged former “prosecutor” D’Nang D*ck is saying the accused has to prove their innocence—which means the burden of proof is not on the prosecution. Now there’s a Constitutional genius.
DUMB@SS!! Dear D*CK: Whatever law school you supposedly went to should retroactively revoke your diploma. You’re an embarassment to the legal profession.
That's exactly right.
That's also why I had been saying for weeks that calling Eric Ciaramella to testify in any proceeding would have been pointless until AFTER his role in this whole charade had been confirmed. I strongly suspect that there may a half-dozen people (or more) who could be considered A "whistleblower" in this matter, which means every one of them has plausible deniability if asked if he or she is THE whistleblower.
Yep, and that was the huge question, if Roberts is not in the loop of collusion and conspiracy then how does he know?
Shifty is going to be amazed at the identity of the whistle-blower and that one of his staff has such a close relationship to him. /SSSS
And by refusing to ask the question, he may have simply been "outing" Ciaramella without directly doing so. LOL.
Rand Paul was great! Put it right out there! Only one I’ve enjoyed listening to.......he used tone and facts and hit it right out of the park....well worth the listen.
He talks to them. He also torched Justice Roberts.
I too am a huge fan/supporter of Senator Paul. He always sticks up for his conservative/libertarian (small “L”) principles regardless of how the press and Social Media attacks him.
Good for him!
If you want to watch the entire speech on the C-SPAN link, it starts about 12:02 ET.
I'd really like to know the answer to that one. Maybe the Chief Justice can tell us?
Unfortunately, I believe that is to a mostly empty chamber.
Could it be that Rand Paul’s question was a backdoor way to confirm the true identify the whistle blower? He’s a real smart cookie to do this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.