Posted on 01/31/2020 9:41:03 AM PST by MaxistheBest
oh, from your keyboard to God’s screen!!
Okay so the grand jury that's been convened in NEW HAVEN CONNECTICUT is a just product of my imagination... you just told me so, I think.
What you're saying is actually correct - if the crime, perp, location were all in DC - like a simple bribery case etc.
That's not what this is, with interstate and even international implications.
Contrary to freeper bleats
Barr is a peach
Freepers know
Negative and scold and snark best
They always do this
Only thing worse was the Bush Love and Adoration society
Which more than anything else damaged this forum
Now look how Bush and GOPe are judged
So who was right
Does Schiff have any kind of immunity since he can claim that everything he did was under the umbrella of his position as an United States Representative.
Unless he goes after him for being a pedo . . .
For a Deep State/Swamp at least 70 years in the making? Yes, it's a little steep.
Don't tease me, Max.
Why do people keep saying this? They convicted mayor Marion Barry.
Barr saved the Republic from a coup.
Military type tribunals, at Gitmo and near Columbia, SC. The prophecy sez the punishments will be so severe, even Trump supporters who are weak-kneed will criticize him for being too tough. Several very high-ups will be executed, and many will get long sentences in the slammer....from Obunghole on down.
Barr can also go after Hillary, th4 DNC, Steele, Fusion GPS, Coie Perkins, etc. for fraud, money laundering, interfering with a federal election, LYING, and failing to file required forms related to ELECTION EXPENSES.
We have our Barr, Hillary and her criminal conspiracy will have their bars (and they are not the drinking kind).
President Trump has repeatedly said he would do whatever he can to make sure what has happened to him will never again happen to an American president ... and I believe he will do just that!
Re Schiff looks more than a little bit like Gollum (Golem is the Yiddish term for a monster. The X-Files show had an episode of that name but it was a good golem).
Re this picture, could be brothers of a different spawn of a mother (say a Hildabeast, Pelosisaurus, Watersbeast, or one of the “Beastie Girls” - AOC, Tlaib the Camel lover, Omar the Red/Green traitor, Ms. Paypal of Washington State or that thing from Massachusetts - Williams?).
Venue: A Brief Look at Federal Law Governing Where a Federal Crime May Be Tried
Unless a statute or these rules permit otherwise, the government must prosecute an offense in a district where the offense was committed.
“Federal Indictments are on the way! “
Conjecture at best.
Nobody has seen an aggressive stance from either Barr or Durham.
Tough talk, no action. None.
Snipers Fired At BOTH Police and Protesters In Ukraine
Remember the protests in Ukraine which led to the old leader being replaced?
If you’ll recall, the ruthless slaughter of people by snipers was the event which turned world opinion against the Ukrainian Prime Minister, and resulted in him having to flee the country.
Italy’s 11th largest newspaper – Il Giornale – reported on an admission by several of the snipers (Google translation) :
“Everyone started shooting two or three shots at a time. It went on for fifteen, twenty minutes. We had no choice. We were ordered to shoot both on the police and the demonstrators, without any difference. I was totally outraged.
“So Georgian Alexander Revazishvilli remembers the tragic shootout of 20 February 2014 in Kiev when a group of mysterious snipers opened fire on crowds and cops massacring over 80 people. That massacre has horrified the world and changed the destiny of Ukraine by forcing President Viktor Yanukovich accused of organizing the shootout. But the massacre also changed the fates of Europe and our country, triggering the crisis that will lead to sanctions against Putin’s Russia. Sanctions revealed a boomerang for the Italian economy ( Watch the video ).
Revazishvilli’s confessions and two other Georgians – gathered by writers in the documentary “Ukraine, the hidden truths” aired tonight at 23.30 on Matrix, Channel 5 – reveal a different and disconcerting truth. The truth of a massacre and the same opposition that accused Yanukovych and his Russian allies. Revazishvilli and his two companions – met and interviewed in the documentary – are a former member of the security services of former Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili and two former militants of his party. Hired in Tbilisi by Mamuka Mamulashvili, Saakashvili’s military adviser, are tasked with supporting – along with other Georgian and Lithuanian volunteers – ongoing demonstrations in Kiev in return for a $5,000 final fee.
***
The following day, Mamulashvili and the leaders of the protest explain to volunteers who will face a police assault at the Conservatory building and at the Ukraine hotel. In that case – he says – we must shoot at the square and sow the chaos. But one of the protagonists confesses to having received another explanation, much more comprehensive. “When Mamulashvili arrived, I also asked him. Things are getting complicated, we have to start shooting – he replied that we can not go to the pre-election presidential elections. But who should shoot? “I asked. He replied that who and where it did not matter, you had to shoot somewhere so much to sow chaos. “
“It did not matter if we fired at a tree, a barricade, or the molotov. confirms another volunteer – what counts was sowing confusion.
BBC interviewed the head of the opposition’s security forces at the time, who confirms that snipers were killing both sides … protesters and police:
And the former Ukranian government security boss said the same thing. Specifically, he said:
Former chief of Ukraine’s Security Service has confirmed allegations that snipers who killed dozens of people during the violent unrest in Kiev operated from a building controlled by the opposition on Maidan square.
Shots that killed both civilians and police officers were fired from the Philharmonic Hall building in Ukraine’s capital, former head of the Security Service of Ukraine Aleksandr Yakimenko told Russia 1 channel. The building was under full control of the opposition and particularly the so-called Commandant of Maidan self-defense Andrey Parubiy who after the coup was appointed as the Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, Yakimenko added.
So the chief of the government’s security forces, the head of the opposition’s security forces, and the snipers themselves all admit the snipers were killing both protesters and police.
Similarly:
[Ukrainian Health Minister Oleh] Musiy, who spent more than two months organizing medical units on Maidan, said that on Feb. 20 roughly 40 civilians and protesters were brought with fatal bullet wounds to the makeshift hospital set up near the square. But he said medics also treated three police officers whose wounds were identical.
Forensic evidence, in particular the similarity of the bullet wounds, led him and others to conclude that snipers were targeting both sides of the standoff at Maidan — and that the shootings were intended to generate a wave of revulsion so strong that it would topple Yanukovych and also justify a Russian invasion.
And the Estonian foreign minister – after visiting Ukraine – told the EU foreign affairs minister that the Maidan opposition deployed the snipers – and fired on both the protesters and the police – to discredit the former government of Ukraine.
The Snipers Were Associated with the Maidan Protesters
While the mainstream media has proclaimed that the sniper fire was definitely from government forces, some of the above-cited sources dispute that claim.
Additionally, BBC reported at the time:
Reporting for Newsnight, Gabriel Gatehouse said he saw what looked like a protester shooting out of a window at the BBC’s Kiev base, the Ukraine Hotel.
BBC interviewed a Maidan protester who admitted that he fired a sniper rifle at police from the Conservatory, and that he was guided by a military veteran within the Maidan resistance. Here are actual pictures a reporter took of Maidan snipers, recently published by BBC:
gunmen at Kiev Conservatory 20 February
(There were reportedly at least 10 Maidan snipers firing from the Conservatory.)
The Frankfurther Allgemein reported that Maidan commander Volodymyr Parasjuk controlled the Conservatory at the time:
Volodymyr Parasjuk – the leader in “self-defense units” of the revolution who had called the night of Yanukovich’s escape, on the stage of Maidan to storm the presidential residence one year ago.
On the day of the massacre Parasjuk was staying with his unit in the colonnaded building of the Kiev Conservatory right at the Maidan. In the days before the death toll had risen, and the fighters grew the conviction alone with limited power as before will not be able to overthrow Yanukovych. “There were at that time many guys who said you have to take the weapon and attack,” said Parasjuk recalls. “Many,” he himself had since long ago it had firearms, often their officially registered hunting rifles.
Tagesschau – a German national and international television news service produced by state-run Norddeutscher Rundfunk on behalf of the German public-service television network ARD – also reported in 2014 that at least some of the sniper fire came from protesters.
And remember, the snipers who admitted firing at both sides were associated with Mikhail Saakashvili and his party. Saakashvili was a huge supporter of the Maidan protesters from the very beginning. As Newsweek reports:
Saakashvili was a supporter of the Ukrainian revolution since the beginning of Euromaidan ….
Indeed, the Maidan protesters who deposed the old Ukrainian prime minister were so pleased with events that they rewarded Saakashvili by appointing him leader of Ukraine’s largest region.
Former AP and Newsweek reporter Robert Parry summarizes what kind of guy Saakashvili is:
NEVER MISS THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST
ZEROHEDGE DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX
Receive a daily recap featuring a curated list of must-read stories.
The latest political move by the … regime in Ukraine was to foist on the people of Odessa the autocratic Georgian ex-President Mikheil Saakashvili, a neoconservative favorite and currently a fugitive from his own country which is seeking him on charges of human rights violations and embezzlement.
***
According to a New York Times profile last September, Saakashvili was there “writing a memoir, delivering ‘very well-paid’ speeches, helping start up a Washington-based think tank and visiting old boosters like Senator John McCain and Victoria Nuland, the assistant secretary of state.”
McCain and Nuland were key neocon backers of the coup that ousted Yanukovych and touched off the bloody civil war that has killed thousands of ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine, while also reviving Cold War tensions between the West and Russia. Before the coup, McCain urged on right-wing protesters with promises of U.S. support and Nuland was overheard hand-picking Ukraine’s new leadership, saying “Yats is the guy,” a reference to Arseniy Yatsenyuk, who became prime minister after the coup.
***
The Georgian prosecutors also have charged Saakashvili with human rights violations for his violent crackdown on political protesters in 2007.
Context: Sniper Attacks As False Flag Terror
Random shootings are a type of false flag terror. For example, in 1985 – as part of the “Gladio” false flag terror campaign (see number 12) – snipers attacked and shot shoppers in supermarkets randomly in Belgium, killing twenty-eight and leaving many wounded.
Shooting both sides is an especially big red flag for a false flag …
Specifically, when authoritarian regimes want to break up protests, they might shoot protesters. On the other hand, when violent protesters shoot government employees, they might be trying to overthrow the government.
But when secretive snipers kill both protesters and the police, it is an indication of a “false flag” attack meant to sow chaos, anger, disgust and a lack of legitimacy.
This has happened many times over the years. For example:
Unknown snipers reportedly killed both Venezuelan government and opposition protesters in the attempted 2002 coup
Unknown snipers fired during Thailand’s 2010 protests, killing both police and protesters
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-17/another-false-flag-terror-admission-snipers-ukraine-%E2%80%9Cprotests%E2%80%9D
see also:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957
Eric Zuesse
June 3, 2018
© Photo: Public domain
This will document that the ‘new Cold War’ between the US and Russia did not start, as the Western myth has it, with Russia’s involvement in the breakaway of Crimea and Donbass from Ukraine, after Ukraine — next door to Russia — had suddenly turned rabidly hostile toward Russia in February 2014. Ukraine’s replacing its democratically elected neutralist Government in February 2014, by a rabidly anti-Russian Government, was a violent event, which produced many corpses. It’s presented in The West as having been a ‘revolution’ instead of a coup; but whatever it was, it certainly generated the ‘new Cold War’ (the economic sanctions and NATO buildup on Russia’s borders); and, to know whether it was a coup, or instead a revolution, is to know what actually started the ‘new Cold War’, and why. So, this is historically very important.
Incontrovertible proofs will be presented here not only that it was a coup, but that this coup was organized by the US Government — that the US Government initiated the ‘new Cold War’; Russia’s Government reacted to America’s aggression, which aims to place nuclear missiles in Ukraine, less than ten minutes flight-time from Moscow. During the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, America had reason to fear Soviet nuclear missiles 103 miles from America’s border. But, after America’s Ukrainian coup in 2014, Russia has reason to fear NATO nuclear missiles not just near, but on, Russia’s border. That would be catastrophic.
If America’s successful February 2014 overthrow and replacement of Ukraine’s democratically elected neutralist Government doesn’t soon produce a world-ending nuclear war (World War III), then there will be historical accounts of that overthrow, and the accounts are already increasingly trending and consolidating toward a historical consensus that it was a coup — that it was imposed by “somebody from the new coalition” — i.e., that the termination of the then-existing democratic (though like all its predecessors, corrupt) Ukrainian Government, wasn’t authentically a ‘revolution’ such as the US Government has contended, and certainly wasn’t at all democratic, but was instead a coup (and a very bloody one, at that), and totally illegal (though backed by The West).
The purpose of the present article will be to focus attention on precisely whom the chief people are who were responsible for perpetrating this globally mega-dangerous (‘Cold-War’-igniting) coup — and thus for creating the world’s subsequent course increasingly toward global nuclear annihilation.
If there will be future history, then these are the individuals who will be in the docks for that history’s harshest and most damning judgments, even if there will be no legal proceedings brought against them. Who, then, are these people?
Clearly, Victoria Nuland, US President Barack Obama’s central agent overseeing the coup, at least during the month of February 2014 when it climaxed, was crucial not only in overthrowing the existing Ukrainian Government, but in selecting and installing its rabidly anti-Russian replacement. The 27 January 2014 phone-conversation between her and America’s Ambassador in Ukraine, Jeffrey Pyatt was a particularly seminal event, and it was uploaded to youtube on 4 February 2014. I have discussed elsewhere that call and its significance. Nuland there and then abandoned the EU’s hope for a still democratic but less corrupt future government for Ukraine, and Nuland famously said, on that call “Fuck the EU,” and she instructed Pyatt to choose instead the rabidly anti-Russian, and far-right, Arseniy Yatsenyuk. This key event occurred 24 days before Ukraine’s President Victor Yanukovych was overthrown on February 20th, and 30 days before the new person to head Ukraine’s Government, Yatsenyuk, became officially appointed to rule the now clearly fascist country. He won that official designation on February 26th. However, this was only a formality: Obama’s agent had already chosen him, on January 27th.
The second landmark item of evidence that it had been a coup and nothing at all democratic or a ‘revolution’, was the 26 February 2014 phone-conversation between the EU’s Foreign Minister Catherine Ashton and her agent in Ukraine investigating whether the overthrow had been a revolution or instead a coup; he was Estonia’s Foreign Minister, Urmas Paet, and he told her that he found that it had been a coup, and that “somebody from the new coalition” had engineered it — but he didn’t know whom that “somebody” was. Both Ashton and Paet were shocked at this finding, but they proceeded immediately to ignore that matter, and to discuss only the prospects for Europe’s investors in Ukraine, to be able to get their money back — their obsession was Ukraine’s corruption. Ashton told Paet that she had herself told the Maidan demonstrators, “you need to find ways in which you can establish a process that will have anti-corruption at its heart.” So, though the EU was unhappy that this had been a coup, they were far more concerned to protect their investors. In any case, the EU clearly wasn’t behind Ukraine’s coup. Equally clearly, they didn’t much care whether it was a coup or instead what the US Government said, a ‘revolution’.
The network behind this coup had actually started planning for the coup back in 2011. That’s when Eric Schmidt of Google, and Jared Cohen, also now of Google but still continuing though unofficially as US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s chief person tasked to plan ‘popular movements’ to overthrow both Yanukovych in Ukraine, and Assad in Syria.
Then, on 1 March 2013, the implementation of this plan started: the first “tech camp” to train far-right Ukrainians how to organize online the mass-demonstrations against Yanukovych, was held inside the US Embassy in Kiev on that date, which was over nine months before the Maidan demonstrations to overthrow Ukraine’s democratically elected President started, on 20 November 2013.
The American scholar Gordon M. Hahn has specialized in studying the evidence regarding whom the actual snipers were who committed the murders, but he focuses only on domestic Ukrainian snipers and ignores the foreign ones, who had been hired by the US regime indirectly through Georgian, Lithuanian and other anti-Russian CIA assets (such as via Mikheil Saakashvili, the ousted President of Georgia whom the US regime subsequently selected to become the Governor of the Odessa region of Ukraine). Hahn’s 2018 book Ukraine Over the Edge states on pages 204-209:
“Yet another pro-Maidan sniper, Ivan Bubenchik, emerged to acknowledge that he shot and killed Berkut [the Government’s police who were protecting Government buildings] before any protesters were shot that day [February 20th]. In a print interview, Bubenchik previews his admission in Vladimir Tikhii’s documentary film, Brantsy, that he shot ahd killed two Berkut commanders in the early morning hours of February 20 on the Maidan. … Bubenchik claims that [on February 20] the Yanukovich regime started the fire in the Trade Union House — where his and many other EuroMaidan fighters lived during the revolt — prompting the Maidan’s next reaction. As noted above, however, pro-Maidan neofascists have revealed that the Right Sector started that fire. … Analysis of the snipers’ massacre shows that the Maidan protesters initiated almost all — at least six out of a possible eight — of the pivotal escalatory moments of violence and/or coercion. … The 30 November 2013 nighttime assault on the Maidan demonstrators is the only clear exception from a conclusive pattern of escalating revolutionary violence led by the Maidan’s relatively small but highly motivated and well-organized neofascist element.”
Although Hahn’s book barely cites the first and most detailed academic study of the climactic coup period of late February, Ivan Katchanovski’s poorly written “The ‘Snipers’ Massacre’ on the Maidan in Ukraine”, which was issued on 5 September 2015, Hahn’s is consistent with that: both works conclude that the available evidence, as Katchanovski puts it, shows that:
“The massacre was a false flag operation, which was rationally planned and carried out with a goal of the overthrow of the government and seizure of power. It [his investigation] found various evidence of the involvement of an alliance of the far right organizations, specifically the Right Sector and Svoboda, and oligarchic parties, such as Fatherland. Concealed shooters and spotters were located in at least 20 Maidan-controlled buildings or areas.”
Hahn downplays US heading of the coup. But shortly before the coup, the CIA secretly trained in Poland the Right Sector founder/leader Dmitriy Yarosh (”Dmytro Jarosz”), who headed Ukraine’s snipers. So, even the Ukrainian ones were working for the US
On 19 November 2017 was issued Gian Micalessin’s “The hidden truth about Ukraine – Part 1”
Obama’s State Department Fixer, Victoria Nuland And Former Ukraine Ambassador, Geoffrey P. Pyatt, Covering For Obama Cockroaches Back In 2016
UKRAINE OR U-CROOK?
It seems like every time I lift a rock in Eastern Europe, the same dirty slugs come slithering out.
First, we had Spygate– the attempt to discredit then-candidate Trump. President Obama and his CIA pitbull John Brennan gave the order, but guess who put it in motion?
Victoria Nuland: the chief ‘fixer’ under both Hillary Clinton and John Kerry at The State Department (‘State’).
How? First, she obtained a fake collection of Russian lies paid for by the Democrat National Committee known as ‘The Steele dossier.’ Then, she spread it around the Swamp Media to smear candidate Trump.
Who acted as the liaison between Barack Obama, George Soros, and their collective?
Victoria Nuland.
Who created and executed the plot to force Ukraine to drop its investigation of Vice-President Biden and Obama’s mentor, George Soros?
Victoria Nuland.
Who also squashed the investigation into their seriously misnomered “Anti-Corruption Action Centre” (AntAc)– of which the Obama Administration had actually partnered with Soros?
You guessed it; Victoria Nuland.
Ant-Ac Activists In Ukraine
Obama/Soros’ Paid Ant-Ac Activists In Ukraine in their ‘F*Ck Corruption’ Tees-(No longer available After Nuland forced the investigation closed to protect Obama and Soros)!
We now know that Victoria Nuland actually instructed Vice Presdient Joe Biden to threaten the withholding of aid to Ukraine unless top Prosecutor, Viktor Shokin– who was investigating Biden’s son and George Soros– was fired. It was her plan.
A clever vixen, no?
This is not just speculation
But how do we know this? Because documents were released on order of a federal court last week proving it.
That was only thanks to a Freedom of Information filing by Citizens United – a private policy organisation investigating corruption (after three years of State Department obfuscation).
And, of course, ‘Quid pro Joe’ publicly bragged about it.
In one of most stupid acts in modern history, Joe Biden– now a presidential candidate in the U.S. – boasted about his Administration’s extortion of the Ukraine on video at the Council of Foreign Relations.
Quid pro quo Joe lays out his corruption for the world – “and son of a bitch! they fired him”
In that same recent court-ordered State Department document dump, we find that George Soros was directing much of that bureaucracy’s foreign policy under his grasshopper’s people through…you guessed it.
Victoria Nuland.
Soros was not only directing foreign policy in his efforts to take over Ukraine’s natural gas industry but at the level of minutiae, such as having Nuland and her staff vet article reviews for him (hat tip and thanks to John Solomon at The Hill):
“Toria, here is my take on Russia’s foray into the bond markets this week, based on the market chatter I’ve been able to pick up,” Soros aide, Canavan wrote in an email, released with heavy redactions hiding most of his advice to Nuland.
And who is “Toria”? – Toria is what close friends call Victoria Nuland – and this is not the only example in that dump. It was like Soros was using the State Department as his personal ‘staff’.
This is corruption at an unprecedented level
I cannot adequately convey how amazingly bizarre it is to have a foreigner – an avowed former Nazi collaborator at that – directing the de facto head of President Obama’s U.S. State Department in foreign policy.
He was doing this for his own personal financial gain of course, but with clear ties to the financial enhancement of top government officials family fortunes as well.
Secretary of State, John Kerry, actually invited George Soros to private State Department events on more than one occasion, as previously reported.
John Kerry with George SorosSo many top former officials are involved it is unlikely Trump will be allowed to survive—in their own words
Meanwhile, Kerry’s family and that of Speaker Pelosi, Senator Mitt Romney, VP Biden, and of course, the Clintons, stood ready for the Ukraine windfall.
Victoria Nuland ran the Department of State for Obama and his mentor, George Soros – under both Secretaries Hillary Clinton and John Kerry.
It was also Nuland who directed Marie Yovanovitch to fly to Ukraine in August of 2016, to replace her alleged boyfriend, Geoffrey Pyatt (with Nuland in the photo above), perhaps, to protect him.
Saul Alinsky’s rules. When you are about to get caught in a crime, accuse your opponent of it first – true or not is of no concern – just be the first!
Yovanovitch’s mission in 2016 was an international crime – and her boss, Victoria Nuland, was well aware of it because she was the conspiracy’s kingpin.
more of this: https://richardsonpost.com/howellwoltz/13944/victoria-nuland-in-the-swamp/
New Haven to Chappequa. How far?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.