Posted on 01/26/2020 11:26:27 AM PST by central_va
WASHINGTON President Donald Trumps campaign is considering only participating in general election debates if an outside firm serves as the host, and his advisers recently sat down with the nonprofit Commission on Presidential Debates to complain about the debates it hosted in 2016.
The Dec. 19 meeting between Frank Fahrenkopf, a prominent Republican and co-chairman of the commission; Brad Parscale, campaign manager for Trumps reelection effort; and another political adviser, Michael Glassner, came soon after Trump posted on Twitter that the 2016 debates had been biased.
(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...
He might be, but I doubt the President would agree to debate. He would have nothing to gain by doing so.
The debates will benefit Trump, biased or not. It would be foolish to sit out. He beat Clinton in no small part based upon his performance in the post-Access Hollywood debate.
“BTW, I cannot think of even one Faux (Fox) anchor I would trust to fairly moderate a debate.”
i don’t know if you consider them “anchors”, but i’d trust Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity, and Jessie Waters ...
BTW, I cannot think of even one Faux (Fox) anchor I would trust to fairly moderate a debate. Greg Gutfield and Tyrus?
“I dont think there will be any Repube Primary debates.”
that’s pretty much a given ...
Because Republicans agree to it.
Trump doesnt need to do debates just do his rallies WHY IN THE HELL would you debate these idiot socialists!!!
I think obvious Trump supporters are not the best idea - just like obvious lefties are a bad idea.
There must be SOME honest, unbiased people. Sharyl Attkisson? Lara Logan? Maybe there’s no middle ground when it comes to the president....I don’t know.
Skip the debates
BINGO!
There’s been 4 years since the 2016 debates, why hasn’t the RNC/Republicans insured the same travesty doesn’t happen this time again?
Judge Janine, Lou Dobbs, Trish Reagan, Charles Payne, Stuart Varney, ALL very smart people that could moderate a debate!!!
Yup.
The moderators will all be leftist shills taking the Dem side on every point, and Trumpasaurus will eat them too. >>
I agree with you 100 per cent.
Trump will take any one of them to the wood shed on National TV, no less. He could do all 3 simultaneously.
This is an opportunity the president would never miss.
Take the cannoli.
Certainly there is no certainty Trump will receive even-handed treatment if the traditional alphabet channels (including Fox News) are in charge of the debate.
If any network news or cable news source (including Fox) is to run one of the debates, it should be balanced by one run by OANN, NewsMax, or some other non-leftist outlet.
No Hannity. Hell just play his non-stop, loopy monologues.
Scathing report?! There better be some scathing arrests and indictments by then!
POTUS should insist no network specific debates. Let them be open feed to all with 3 or 4 cameras only. Each candidate gets to pick one moderator. They alternate questions. This should result in fairness of views represented. No town hall debates with questioners pre-screened or pre-written by the MSM or DNC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.