Posted on 01/23/2020 3:30:38 AM PST by karpov
...
When considering the Democrats’ high-minded arguments, ask yourself: What if Hillary Clinton won in 2016? After she took office, it would have been revealed that her campaign hired the opposition-research firm Fusion GPS, which assigned Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence official, to reach out to Russian counterparts to solicit dirt on Donald Trump. Recall that the since-discredited dossier Mr. Steele peddled to the media in the fall of 2016 was made up of unsubstantiated rumors from former Russian agents.
It’s naive to believe the Kremlin was unaware that Mr. Steele asked Moscow pals for dirt on Mr. Trump. Those spies are retired, but they rely on Vladimir Putin for their pension checks. Who among congressional Democrats would now be calling for Mrs. Clinton’s removal if she were in the Oval Office? I doubt any. I’ve searched in vain for Democratic criticism for her soliciting foreign involvement in the 2016 election—the principal charge of their impeachment case against President Trump.
Furthermore, while Democrats say Mr. Trump should be removed for seeking a quid pro quo—a Ukrainian investigation of Joe and Hunter Biden in return for U.S. military aid—what about President Barack Obama’s March 2012 open-mic moment? At a summit in Seoul, he asked Russian President Dmitry Medvedev to tell his boss, then-Prime Minister Putin, that “on all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this can be solved but it’s important for him to give me space. . . . This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.” In other words, if Mr. Putin didn’t create problems during Mr. Obama’s re-election fight with Mitt Romney, Mr. Obama would show “flexibility” on missile defense and other important issues of national security and foreign policy after the election. Again, crickets when it comes to Democratic criticism.
(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...
What is inaccurate in what I said?
Congratulations are in order! This reveals a new level of stupidity for you.
Let me set you straight: the RINOS and GOPe hacks in congress hate Trump would like nothing better than to go "Maverick", impeach Trump and get rid of him if they only had the smallest legitimate reason to do so.
You post that and I'm the stupid one?
Because you are a dumb a$$ liberal and not a conservative you can't see that. All of us NORMALS can see it a mile away. The GOP is waitng out Trump so they can get back to "business as usual".
Democrats AND Republicans would protect the Kenyan from Indonesia, if only to cover their own complicity in violating the Constitution.
Obama is not a natural born citizen.
No child of a foreign national, born with more than one nationality, is NATURALLY an American.
Rove, like all the rest of the Bush League Republicans, is up to his neck in assisting in the violation of the Constitution that was the Kenyanesian Usurpation to pave the way for George P. Bush who was born a Mexican national from his Mexican national mother.
And the rest of the popular children of foreigners, Haley, Cruz, Rubio, Jindal.
“...as suspect as Trump’s.”? That’s got to be one of the dumbest statements ever made in the WSJ, which has made some pretty stupid ones.
All this is known about Clinton, Comey, et al, and nothing has happened. NOTHING! Trump wanted to let her off the hook in his first speech as President. Never any consequences for Democrats. I’m pretty much over it.
I believe you are correct, sir. Plenty of RINOS see their gravy train threatened as Trump is exposing pay to play schemes and successfully implementing his AMERICA FIRST agenda.
Just my two cents.. Have a great day
None of Trumps dealings with foreign leaders look ‘’suspect’’. F’ing WSJ.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.