[Mr_Moonlight]

Nadler added that “Hunter Biden has no knowledge of the accusations against the president."

... and he knows this *how* ???

Did he interview Hunter? If so, then how does he know that Hunter has "no knowledge" ? Why is he protecting him if Hunter supposedly has "no knowledge" ??

[AnthonySoprano]

.

Good Question

Why are they running from Hunter Biden, if he does know anything?

‘

[JoSixChip]

... and he knows this *how* ???

Like I have been saying for months now. They are not going to let Trump call anyone he wants as a witness or investigate any corruption. They will only allow Trump to defend himself against the actual articles of impeachment. This is all about damaging Trump and the gop senators are part of it. Ask yourself, how could we possibly get this far without a single republican senate committee investigating what was going on in Ukraine with $7B missing or the start of the ICIG whistle blower complaint. Just wait until bolton gets on the stand.

[Vendome]

Nadler added that “Hunter Biden has no knowledge of the accusations against the president.”

Maybe he heard something from a friend who relayed a story, from another man, to him...

Let’s find out...

[xkaydet65]

I agree with Nadler. How could Biden know about the accusations against POTUS. When I read them they did not specify which if any laws had been broken.

[Pearls Before Swine]

Nadler added that “Hunter Biden has no knowledge of the accusations against the president."

That's irrelevant. What is relevant is whether there is legitimate reason for suspicion that there was corruption in the Ukraine, and that Hunter seems like one obvious place to look.