Skip to comments.
Iowa man who burned pride flag stolen from church sentenced to 16 years
New York Post ^
| December 20, 2019
| Amanda Woods
Posted on 12/21/2019 7:51:40 AM PST by gattaca
An Iowa man will spend up to 16 years behind bars for stealing a pride flag from an Iowa church and setting it on fire a sentence that even a local LGBTQ group says might be excessive, according to a new report.
Adolfo Martinez, 30, of Ames, was sentenced Wednesday for stealing the pride banner hanging at Ames Church of Christ back in June and then burning it with lighter fluid and a lighter outside the Dangerous Curves Gentlemans Club, The Des Moines Register reported.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: cruelandunusual; freespeech; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
1
posted on
12/21/2019 7:51:40 AM PST
by
gattaca
To: gattaca
16 years for a Lesbo flag. ZERO years for the American Flag. C’mon Americans. Lets dump the Marxists and dump them deep.
2
posted on
12/21/2019 7:53:49 AM PST
by
Don Corleone
(The truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth)
To: gattaca
3
posted on
12/21/2019 7:54:02 AM PST
by
AAABEST
(NY/DC/LA media/political/military industrial complex DELENDA EST)
To: gattaca
Obviously he burned the wrong flag. Shoulda thought differently.
4
posted on
12/21/2019 7:54:56 AM PST
by
Delta 21
(Be strong & prosper, be weak & die! Stay true.... ~~ Donald J. Trump)
To: gattaca
5
posted on
12/21/2019 7:55:15 AM PST
by
unread
(Joe McCarthy was right.......)
To: gattaca
a sentence that even a local LGBTQ group says might be excessive
What do we have, a butthurt closeted fagget judge?
6
posted on
12/21/2019 7:55:55 AM PST
by
heshtesh
To: gattaca
But since Martinez is considered a habitual offender, a longer term is permissible.
His prior convictions worked against him.
7
posted on
12/21/2019 7:56:41 AM PST
by
Meatspace
To: Don Corleone
There is no good live queer
The only good queer is in the closet
8
posted on
12/21/2019 7:56:54 AM PST
by
bert
( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
To: gattaca
I suppose he deserves to spend a little time behind bars....for “endangerment” for example. Ten bucks says he would have,at most,gotten probation if he had done *exactly* the same thing with an American flag...or a Christian or Jewish bible.
9
posted on
12/21/2019 7:56:55 AM PST
by
Gay State Conservative
(The Rats Can't Get Over The Fact That They Lost A Rigged Election)
To: gattaca
Not any mention of who the judge is that sentenced him.
Can’t find that anywhere.
.
10
posted on
12/21/2019 7:58:30 AM PST
by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: gattaca
The arson as a hate crime charge carries a maximum prison sentence of five years. A year and a month is customary for the other two charges, according to the Register. But since Martinez is considered a habitual offender, a longer term is permissible.
He didn't try to burn down the whole church. His previous offenses must have been some doozies.
To: Gay State Conservative
Most of his sentence is based on his being a habitual offender.
To: gattaca
SCOTUS has already decided that burning a flag is protected speech. So, its a little hard to square his conviction for a hate crime or arson with it. Still, stealing is stealing and so is trespassing but, cmon, 16 effin years? Free speech issue for scotus but it will never get there.
13
posted on
12/21/2019 8:01:25 AM PST
by
ARW
To: gloryblaze
Usually if you are in parole and you are released with five or ten years remaining on that sentence, they can tack that time on to a sentence if you are convicted of another offense.
Turns out homo sex makes America great again. Who knew?
15
posted on
12/21/2019 8:03:49 AM PST
by
proust
(Justice delayed is injustice.)
To: gattaca
To scorn queers is not a crime nor is it hate
Scorn is ok and legal. Ditto contempt
I hold Nancy Pelosi in contempt, with complete scorn for her very being
16
posted on
12/21/2019 8:05:24 AM PST
by
bert
( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
To: gattaca
Isn’t there a Constitutional ban on excessive fines and punishments?
17
posted on
12/21/2019 8:05:36 AM PST
by
A_Former_Democrat
(Guns up . . . We cominÂ’ PS: Eric The Blower Ciaramella. PASS IT ON)
To: Meatspace
I can see where "habitual offender" might be worthy of consideration when the *current* crime is serious. A guy with a history of armed robberies (for example) might get more time on a rape conviction than he might have gotten without that history.
But stealing and burning a flag?
I'm no lawyer but I can easily see this sentence overturned in the Federal courts.
18
posted on
12/21/2019 8:06:25 AM PST
by
Gay State Conservative
(The Rats Can't Get Over The Fact That They Lost A Rigged Election)
To: proust
19
posted on
12/21/2019 8:06:27 AM PST
by
proust
(Justice delayed is injustice.)
To: gattaca
If he was a muslim, he could run for office in Michigan’s 13th congressional district.
20
posted on
12/21/2019 8:09:19 AM PST
by
samtheman
(U.S. out of the U.N. --- U.N. out of the U.S.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson