You’re concerned about the hypen? I’m more concerned about having another faggot on the bench. Guess we have our priorities straight. Anyone ask him about what his thoughts are about the “bake the cake” issue?
That being said , he should keep his preferences in that area to himself.
Read his background in post 2. Why can’t gays have their own conservative views just like the folks we praise for blaxit and jexit
— or even white folks can have their own conservative
Views and that is all
Right
Anyone ask him about what his thoughts are about the “bake the cake” issue?
Are you kidding?
I love these schadenfreude moments. Makes the libs twist themselves in knots. Both over the fact a Group Member isn’t in their camp, and trying NOT to say why they don’t like him.
Don’t worry, before long libs will be calling him all kinds of names that conservatives aren’t allowed to use.
I’m not thrilled about having a sexual pervert in a position to judge others either.
He should recuse himself from any case where sexual orientation is a factor.
It’s kind of shocking to see a party line vote on a gay nominee where the Republicans are all for and the Democrats are all against.
Part of me thinks that makes for interesting politcal fodder. And part of me thinks I would never want to expose the general public to fodder of that nature.
Opinions and epithets like this do nothing for the conservative movement. My neighbors two doors down are a gay couple (don't think they are legally bound) who are probably more conservative than I am.
I’m concerned about it being yet another Yale/Harvard graduate. One takeaway from the Kavanaugh hearings is that we learned that way too many of the judicial elite have inbred academic and social backgrounds, and they’re no different from others in the elite of politics and DC power.