[Lurkinanloomin]

Latinos are descendants of Spanish people, from Spain, which is in Europe.

[rktman]

I looked and sure enough there it is plain as day for all to see. Yup. Attached to europe. Uh, hey aoc-——fah-q!

[Little Bill]

One of the things that I find interesting is that after the 1848 unplesidents the Latinos that we acquired became full citizens.

[semantic]

Not the full blooded Indians you see in many town/village squares. There's also a lot of them begging while people are waiting in line to cross the border. (Back into the USA, 'natch; no wait to enter MX.) In fact, a lot of them can't even speak Spanish.

Still, a two-fold question remains:

- Was there anyone else here when the so-called 'first peoples' migrated across the Bering straits?

- If there was no one else here, is it a process of first come, first served, or "finder's keepers"? And if that's the case, who made up those rules anyway?

Nah, the real rule is possession is 99% per cent of the law (of the jungle). You get it, you defend it, you hold it - for you and your posterity.

Which works both ways, of course. If current American citizens are so weak that they cannot defend what they currently enjoy, then someone is gonna come by to take it. History/time isn't static - this land wasn't some bequest that everyone else on the globe must bow down and respect.

The real reaction is: fvck that shit; if those suckers can't/won't defend it, I'm gonna take it. And props to them too - what's good for the goose is good for the gander.