Posted on 12/10/2019 8:20:08 AM PST by Kaslin
Throughout human history land has always belonged to those who can take and hold it. Works the same way in the animal kingdom too.
I wonder if AOC subscribes to La Raza?
“Por la raza todo, fuera de la raza nada”
I agree with the whole concept but horrible writing is distracting.
You have to ask?!
Yeah, I was wondering who “Sandy” was too.
One of the things that I find interesting is that after the 1848 unplesidents the Latinos that we acquired became full citizens.
“Sandy” is short for Alexandria (Ocasio-Cortez), I think. Horrible writing, though, I will agree.
Still, a two-fold question remains:
- Was there anyone else here when the so-called 'first peoples' migrated across the Bering straits?
- If there was no one else here, is it a process of first come, first served, or "finder's keepers"? And if that's the case, who made up those rules anyway?
Nah, the real rule is possession is 99% per cent of the law (of the jungle). You get it, you defend it, you hold it - for you and your posterity.
Which works both ways, of course. If current American citizens are so weak that they cannot defend what they currently enjoy, then someone is gonna come by to take it. History/time isn't static - this land wasn't some bequest that everyone else on the globe must bow down and respect.
The real reaction is: fvck that shit; if those suckers can't/won't defend it, I'm gonna take it. And props to them too - what's good for the goose is good for the gander.
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.