I hate it when people say that just because someone raises a point. What specifically do you disagree with in their post? I actually was not sure what they meant. Happy to have your take.
Above post is nonsense because Durham was NOT commenting about HIS investigation, he was commenting on the IG report and making a general statement that there are inaccuracies in IG's conclusions. That in no way exposes any pertinent facts of Durham's investigation. I am not aware of any law which prohibits commenting on an ongoing investigation. It is actually a ruse used by non-scrupulous bureaucrats to avoid answering questions. The poster's intent in posting this comment is therefore intended to cause division among Freepers.