Posted on 11/27/2019 1:02:54 PM PST by robowombat
Bloomberg bets 2020 campaign on unprecedented strategy BY JULIA MANCHESTER - 11/27/19 03:32 PM EST
Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s unconventional campaign strategy is panning out to be one of riskiest experiments in primary politics, testing the limits of personal wealth and name recognition.
Bloomberg, who officially threw his hat in the Democratic primary ring last week, will not accept donations nor fund his own campaign, automatically disqualifying himself from the primary debates.
The billionaire politician also says he plans to focus on the Super Tuesday states, and won’t compete in the crucial early contest states of Iowa and New Hampshire.
Operatives acknowledge Bloomberg’s game plan is risky, but are not dismissing his chances given that he is backed by his enormous personal wealth.
Bloomberg is worth roughly over $50 billion and has long championed liberal causes like combatting climate change. But he is also a former Republican, an affiliation that is expected to draw scrutiny during the primary.
The former mayor is hoping his history in politics and advocacy on issues such as gun control could be key in building a coalition of moderate and liberal voters.
That's a feat none of the existing candidates in the race have been able to pull off so far in a race that has featured four leading contenders: former Vice President Joe Biden and South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg from the party's centrist wing, and Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) from the progressive camp.
Whether Bloomberg can emerge as an alternative without spending time in early states or facing off on the debate stage remains in doubt.
“I think skipping the early states and skipping the debates could definitely be a problem,” veteran Democratic operative David Brock told The Hill.
“Both of those are opportunities to speak more directly to voters.”
Other strategists, however, argue that Bloomberg’s absence from Iowa and New Hampshire may not be critical because of the states’ lack of voter diversity.
“I have to say it'll probably piss people [off] in Iowa, New Hampshire, who are used to almost two years of slavish devotion,” a Democratic strategist told The Hill. “But is it a bad thing to move beyond those small, white, rural, under-representative early states?”
Another former New York City Mayor, Rudy Giuliani, similarly skipped the early states for the most part to focus on Florida and the Super Tuesday states. The strategy ended badly, and he was forced to withdraw after finishing third in the Sunshine State and never even making it to Super Tuesday.
Despite being a billionaire and former mayor of New York, Bloomberg will similarly have to work to put his name out in a number of the Super Tuesday states where he is less known, such as those in the South.
But unlike Giuliani, Bloomberg has deployed a $31 million ad buy across 98 local media markets, as well as on some national cable outlets -- an unprecedented level of spending for a candidate who has just joined the race.
Whether that can be enough remains to be seen. Warren attacked Bloomberg for using "bags and bags of money" to buy his way into the race, while Sanders declared himself "disgusted" by the spending.
“His name ID his significantly less than Biden or Warren or Sanders in any of those states in the middle [of the country] of the South,” Michael Gordon, a Democratic strategist and principal at Group Gordon, said. “His money can help there but he doesn’t have the longstanding credibility."
In order to be competitive in the South, Bloomberg will need to perform well among African-Americans, a potential hurdle given the scrutiny on his record as New York City mayor.
The billionaire this month apologized for his “stop and frisk” policing strategy during his tenure as mayor, saying he did not understand “the full impact that stops were having on the black and Latino communities.”
There are also few signs that Bloomberg has built-in support from other critical Democratic constituencies such as Latinos. Sanders, for example, has avidly courted Latino voters since his 2016 campaign.
“The political reality is, I don't think he will do exceptionally well with Latino voters because I don't think they know who the heck he is," Moe Vela, a Democratic strategist and former adviser in the Clinton and Obama White Houses, told The Hill.
“I’ve never seen Michael Bloomberg do anything to connect with the Latino community,” he continued. “So all of the sudden you’re going to come into Texas and California and Super Tuesday states and you’re going to pump in a bunch of money.”
Bloomberg’s absence on the debate stage could also prove to be a hurdle in his efforts to familiarize voters with his name.
A number of candidates like Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and businessman Andrew Yang are scrambling to ensure they get a spot on next month’s debate stage under toughened criteria.
But other strategists believe Bloomberg can afford not to take part in debates given that he is better known than some of the lower-polling candidates in the race.
“So many of them are fighting for oxygen that they are looking for a clip that can go viral, they're looking for a mention or maybe even a seat around the [morning news shows] table,” another Democratic strategist said. “He doesn’t have to do that. Michael Bloomberg doesn’t fight for oxygen.”
Others say Bloomberg could even benefit from being absent from the primary debates, and avoiding the likely on-stage attacks from candidates such as Warren and Sanders.
“Why would you want to stay in a place where your opponents could beat the devil out of you?” veteran New York strategist Hank Sheinkopf, who has worked with Bloomberg, told The Hill.
Despite the doubts about Bloomberg's strategy, few are willing to dismiss his chances in an unusually fluid race that has seen candidates such as Buttigieg vault from obscurity to top contender in the matter of months.
“Six months ago, there was a guy with a name no one could pronounce from a state with a low population, from a city that very few people go to to visit,” Sheinkopf said, referring to Buttigieg. “He is now one of the top four competitors in public polling.”
“This is 2019,” he said. “Anything can happen.”
Yeah, he’s serious, I mean he’s getting old and you can’t take that cash with you.
About the same size, I think, I don’t know.
Interesting you bring up Perot. if Bloomberg doesn’t get the D vote, would he go 3rd party thinking he could get centrist D’s AND never-trumper R’s?
I don’t think he could get enough EC votes to win, but perhaps enough to screw us out of enough swing states and hand the vote to one of the idiot Commie D’s who winds up their nominee and then Pres., God forbid.
CCing some experts.
I don’t see Bloomberg ever getting centrists.
But take that with a grain of salt. Now, before he runs.
Because just as Elisabeth Warren has never been able to shake the fake indian scandal Bloomberg is similarly known for his plans to ban large soft drinks and table salt when he was mayor.
He might get the nonpolitical vote in some areas—those who say they want some “civility.” They know nothing about the issues but go by the shallowest of emotions. Name recognition, celebrity worship, and in this case wealth worship.
Someone should write something on his Seven Deadly Sins party in London. Oh wait. These are Democrats we’re talking.
A former Republican versus a former Democrat.
His ads here are attacking Trump and guns and about his business accomplishment. He is looking at the moderate voters, except the moderate voters are either Independent voters or RINOs.
I don’ think centrists d’s care as much about govt tell telling them they can’t drink big sodas and have extra salt as much as they want to unseat Pres. Trump...
Wow. I bet everything else about the party has been erased from the net.
I remember it was a bit of a bacchanal but now they make it seem like nothing more than an expensive extravagance.
Need someone with a lexis/nexus account to dig more.
Centrists have never wanted to unseat trump and they have left the Democrat party., and even the manufactured polls show unseating Trump to be a hard left issue.
Keep in mind that there is no majority party.
Forty percent of registered voters are independents, and they put Trump in office by overwhelming both the Democrat vote manufacturing machine and the Neocons...a large percentage of which not only didn’t vote for Trump but crossed over and voted for Hillary. Bill Kristol isn’t some kind of one off flyer. He is a typical Neocon.
I was referring to centrist DEMS who may find Sanders and Warren too far left and Biden too corrupt/dementia.
Centris Ds still want to unseat Trump. Bloomberg is an option for them.
(I am a broken glass Trump supporter).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.